[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Figures speak for themselves’ say anti wind-turbine marchers 

Credit:  The Yorkshire Post | 10 July 2014 | www.yorkshirepost.co.uk ~~

Campaigners who claim East Yorkshire has been “industrialised” by huge numbers of wind farms have criticised a council for making it difficult to stage a march they are holding this weekend.

East Yorkshire has the highest density of turbines in the country and hundreds are due to march from Beverley Westwood on East Riding Council this Saturday to say “enough is enough.”

Speakers include Haltemprice and Howden MP David Davis, who is backing a Bill to end wind farm subsidies, and residents from 27 villages will attend.

Planning portfolio holder Coun Symon Fraser said yesterday the council was “their ally and not their enemy” and they should be marching on the Planning Inspectorate in Bristol, which has over-ruled local refusal decisions with “alarming regularity”.

But organiser Soraya Hutchinson said the council “did everything possible not to engage” with the march, not giving them the road closure notices they had been chasing since May.

She said: “It was only the police helping us on Monday that allowed this to go ahead.”

Although the council’s strategic draft policy 2014 states its aim “protect and enhance views across valued landscape features” and “protect the undeveloped coast” figures “speak for themselves” with 223 turbines over 50m high built, approved or pending consideration, and applications almost doubling in the last six months.

But Coun Fraser said the council had to follow Government guidance and “must be fundamentally positive and enabling.” Despite this they’d tried to reflect local opinion by refusing many applications.

Source:  The Yorkshire Post | 10 July 2014 | www.yorkshirepost.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky