[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Energy towers don’t make sense  

Credit:  Yuma Sun | June 10, 2014 | www.yumasun.com ~~

It’s just a change of the name of the towers, a change of site, and other changes to Pickett’s Clean Wind Energy Towers he proposed two years ago. Now it’s going to be called Solar Wind Energy Tower and it is to be built on private property rather than on federal land.

Two years ago, Pickett proposed two towers 3,000 feet high and 1,500 in diameter and now is proposing 2,250 feet for the height which is 750 feet less. The reason for the reduction of height is to enable the use of concrete in place of steel reducing the construction costs. He proposes to have the towers built in stages with the first one ready for operation in 2018.

The development agreement anticipates that the city of San Luis will receive $2.9 million from Solar Wind Energy Tower in the sale of water for the towers. How did they determine how many millions of gallons of water to be used in the towers to come up with $2.9 million?

The pact makes other requirements of the company. One of them is that the project will create 2,000 temporary jobs in the construction phase, plus 500 full-time workers at the towers.

The cost for 2,000 temporary workers at $10 an hour would be $20,000 per hour, one month would amount to $400,000 and one year would be $4,800,000.

For the 500 operators at an estimated $15 an hour, you’d have to run four shifts to run 24/7, which would be 125 per shift. It would cost $315,000 a week. Four weeks would cost $1,260,000 and for one year $15,120,000.

In reality, to run three turbines and generators with two operators per turbine generator, six operators per shift, for three shifts 18, to operate 24/7 there is the fourth shift, for a total of 24 operators, at a cost of $15 per hour for eight hours, seven days a week, would be $15,120; for a year, $786,240.

The difference of cost between 500 operators and 24 would be $14,333,760. That’s quite a difference.

I don’t think Mr. Pickett knows how many operators it takes.

I believe Mr. Pickett has conned the San Luis Council members by overstating the number of jobs created, and the number of local employees that would bring revenue to the San Luis economy.


Source:  Yuma Sun | June 10, 2014 | www.yumasun.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.