LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Campaigners’ joy at wind farm victory 

Credit:  Malton & Pickering Mercury | 04 June 2014 | www.maltonmercury.co.uk ~~

Campaigners against a wind farm – which would have boasted turbines twice the height of York Minster – have hailed a decision by the Government to block the proposals.

Eric Pickles, the Secretary of State for Communities, last week overruled a planning inspector who recommended that RWE Npower Renewables Ltd’s plans for ten 126-metre high wind turbines at East Heslerton should go ahead – despite almost unanimous rejection by Ryedale District Council’s Planning Committee.

He ruled the windfarm “would introduce a highly intrusive form of development”.

The turbines, he said, would harm the view from the North Yorkshire Moors National Park as well as interfere with the 
enjoyment of heritage assets such as St Andrew’s Church, East Heslerton.

Mr Pickles agreed with the National Park’s director of planning that the development “would seriously undermine these landscape features” because of “its scale, vertical emphasis, the number of turbines, their elevated siting, movement and prominence on the horizon.”

The decision by Mr Pickles has delighted campaigners who have fought a four-year battle against the wind farm proposals.

Leading campaigner Paul Stephens, whose farm would have been in the shadows of the turbines, said: “As a farmer, I consider myself a custodian of the countryside and it is my duty to look after the place where I am privileged to live.

“My principal reason for objection for the last four years has been because I hated the thought that my two neighbours and the developer, wanted to build a huge wind factory in this area of High Landscape Value, purely for financial reward and without any concern for their neighbours and the enjoyment that local people and visitors get when they want to take in the beauty of this area.

“I have been called a Nimby by objecting, but if this means that I want to protect the area where I was born and the countryside that I love, then I am proud to be a Nimby.”

“The dismissal of the appeal is the best news that has happened for the Yorkshire Wolds as I hope it sends a clear message to the developers of other proposed wind farms in the area.”

The RWE Npower Renewables scheme attracted widespread opposition from residents in the district, as well as from parish councils, Ryedale District Council and other authorities and organisations, including the Ministry of Defence, Campaign to Protect Rural England and English Heritage.

The company, however, argued there was support locally for their plans.

The controversy led to a public inquiry which resulted in planning inspector Paul Jackson recommending in favour of the development, only to be overturned by Mr Pickles.

Ryedale Cllr Edward Legard, who represents the Wolds ward, said: “His decision has significant implications not only for Ryedale but for the wider geographical area – East Yorkshire in particular – where the construction of large wind farms remains a constant threat.

“This was never an argument about renewable energy but all about preserving, for future generations, an historic and precious landscape.”

*RWE Npower Renewables Ltd now has six weeks to decide whether to take the case to the High Court.

Source:  Malton & Pickering Mercury | 04 June 2014 | www.maltonmercury.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky