LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Supreme Court backs ANR decision in Lowell wind appeal 

Credit:  John Herrick | May 27, 2014 | vtdigger.org ~~

The Vermont Supreme Court last week upheld a state stormwater runoff permit for Green Mountain Power’s wind farm on Lowell Mountain.

Opponents of the 21-turbine Kingdom Community Wind project appealed the permit because they said it did not comply with the state’s stormwater standards and would cause additional environmental impacts.

The high court denied those claims and upheld the Agency of Natural Resources’ permit that approved the use of so-called level spreaders – erosion-control strips that slow and spread stormwater so soil can absorb it more easily.

“We are pleased by the decision that recognized that our stormwater staff was thorough and careful in reviewing and approving a stormwater treatment practice for the Kingdom Community Wind Project that protected the receiving streams while also maintaining the natural features on Lowell Mountain,” Agency of Natural Resources Secretary Deb Markowitz said in a statement.

The energy advocacy group appealing the permit, Energize Vermont, said level spreaders have a history of failing on steep slopes and do not comply with the state’s permitting standards.

“We are even more concerned that Vermont’s environment and water quality are being handed over to developers to degrade rather than to maintain and protect as required,” said Mark Whitworth, the group’s executive director, in a statement.

The court, however, gave “substantial deference” to the agency to decide what technologies comply with the Vermont Stormwater Management Manual (VSMM).

“As all parties noted, we generally give substantial deference to an agency’s interpretation of its own regulations – in this case, ANR’s interpretation of the VSMM,” Justice John Dooley wrote in the order.

The Attorney General’s Office worked with the ANR on the appeal.

“The Court made clear that it will not second-guess the Agency’s expertise in highly technical areas like stormwater management,” Attorney General Bill Sorrell said in a statement. “The Court affirmed that the Agency may use its expertise to approve innovative approaches to manage stormwater that fully protect Vermont’s waters.”

Source:  John Herrick | May 27, 2014 | vtdigger.org

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky