LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Chapmanslade villagers take stand against ‘massive’ Thoulstone Farm turbine 

Credit:  By Richard McAllister | This Is Wiltshire | 23rd May 2014 | www.thisiswiltshire.co.uk ~~

Villagers turned out in force to show their opposition to plans for a wind turbine at Thoulstone Farm last week.

More than 60 people went along to a meeting of Chapmanslade Parish Council last Thursday and the majority voiced opposition to plans for the 87 metre turbine on Thoulstone Farm.

Council chairman Cllr Phil Jefferson said: “The people who have approached us have said loud and clear that they do not want the wind turbine and we have a responsibility to represent the views of the community at the appropriate time.”

He also reported that the council had received about 40 emails, most of which were in opposition to the plans.

Opponent Mary Medhurst, from Chapmanslade, attended the council meeting.

She said: “The turbine will be seen from Chapmanslade.

“Once one of these massive machines goes up, others are only too likely to follow.

“It was revealed at the meeting that the same developers have bought two plots of land of the same circular diameter on the farm.

“If they are planning two turbines we should be told.”

Steve Hack from the applicants Seren Energy, a Swansea company that specialises in renewable energy, said: “We will shortly be submitting the application to the council.

“The two plots of land were bought to clarify ownership issues and at the time we did not know where it would be placed.”

“The turbine would go at one site or the other and not both.”

He added that the site was not suitable for two wind turbines because of noise restrictions.

Source:  By Richard McAllister | This Is Wiltshire | 23rd May 2014 | www.thisiswiltshire.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky