LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind energy means subsidies, high costs 

Credit:  Express-Times | May 20, 2014 | www.lehighvalleylive.com ~~

Manufacturing is returning to our nation because of the boom in natural gas production. It is time to understand that low-cost clean energy is a feel-good myth that has many negative effects.

I found it humorous that one writer complains about fracturing. She states her home uses wind power for electricity yet she compares the cost to coal-fired electricity. But since she chooses wind energy, let’s get the facts.

The U.S. government subsidizes 90 percent of the cost of installing wind power equipment. In 2012, taxpayers in five states that produce little to no wind energy paid more than $950 million in federal wind production tax subsidies. On a raw per unit of energy produced basis, subsidies for wind power are more than 200 times greater than those given to oil and gas. In Texas, which produces the most wind energy, upgrades to transmission lines to get wind energy to cities will cost every Texan $270.

In the United Kingdom, which under environmentalists’ pressure committed to wind power years ago, the results are high-cost electricity rates. In fact, the cost is so high that it is a major issue in UK elections.

The cost for electricity in the UK is 27.348 cents per kilowatt hour. Met-Ed charges me 7.7 cents. UK power consumers pay 351 percent more than I pay. One of the major cost drivers is subsidies that the UK government gives to the wind industry. So far this has cost UK electric consumers nearly $1.3 billion on their electric bills.

There are many other costs associated with wind energy production. We need the least expensive, least polluting and most reliable source of energy. Using current technology natural gas is it.

TOM FITZGERALD
Forks Township

Source:  Express-Times | May 20, 2014 | www.lehighvalleylive.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky