[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Group to sue U.S. over changes to eagle protection rules  

Credit:  By Laura Zuckerman | Reuters | May 1, 2014 | www.reuters.com ~~

Conservationists plan to sue the U.S. government over new rules they say loosen protection for eagles killed by wind farm turbines, arguing they threaten decades of protection that saved the bald eagle, America’s national emblem, from extinction.

The American Bird Conservancy notified the administration on Wednesday of its intent to sue over the changes, which grant wind farms permission to kill eagles accidentally for a period of 30 years without having to apply for a new permit, rather than five years as previously required.

U.S. law bans killing bald and golden eagles without a permit, except for narrow purposes such as scientific research.

In 2009 the government expanded the permits to include other activities, including renewable energy.

The new 30-year permit rule, issued by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in December, is aimed at further encouraging the development of renewable energy sources such as wind power, but conservationists want them overturned.

Experts differ on how many eagles are killed by wind farms each year. The Fish and Wildlife service estimates that 85 bald and golden eagles have died this way since 1997.

Doug Bell, wildlife program manager with the East Bay Regional Park District in Northern California, says that 50 to 70 golden eagles are killed each year in his area.

In the required notice of intent to sue the U.S. government, the American Bird Conservancy argued the change violates federal laws like the Endangered Species Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, contains no scientific justification and was generated without the benefit of an assessment of the nation’s eagle populations.

The rule “undermines the nation’s longstanding commitment to conservation of eagles,” which have immense cultural and symbolic value, the conservancy said in legal documents.

Fish and Wildlife Service spokeswoman Laury Parramore said the Interior Department agency would not comment on pending litigation.

Lindsay North, spokeswoman for the American Wind Energy Association, did not respond to a request for comment on Wednesday. (Editing by Sharon Bernstein and Michael Perry)

Source:  By Laura Zuckerman | Reuters | May 1, 2014 | www.reuters.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.