LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Bigger buffer zones 

Industrial wind turbine projects are planned for New Glasgow, Barrington and Wedgeport (April 22 story). Will residents be protected by adequate setback distances from industrial wind turbines?

Pictou County residents, including many who experience sleep disturbance and other health effects from existing wind turbines, are asking Pictou County council to amend the wind turbine bylaw to provide a setback distance of 1.5 kilometres.

Also, a few days ago, the area MLA tabled in the legislature a petition signed by 700 residents, asking that the Greenfield wind turbine project not be allowed to proceed.

Residents are worried about health issues such as sleep disturbance from the project which would have approximately a one-kilometre setback from houses.

In Kings County, there is a moratorium on wind turbine projects pending results from a Health Canada study. In Ontario, 70 municipalities have signed a statement that they do not want wind turbine developments. A safer setback of two kilometres is required in Saint Laurent Nord, Quebec; Wainfleet and Plympton-Wyoming, Ont; Lincolnshire, England, and the State of Victoria, Australia.

Nova Scotia county councils should improve wind turbine bylaws and protect their residents with a setback of at least two kilometres between houses and industrial wind turbines.

Nancy Campbell, West Earltown

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky