[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm not worth the risk 

Credit:  The Baltimore Sun | April 24, 2014 | www.baltimoresun.com ~~

Tom Vinson’s and Bruce Burcat’s arguments (“A wind-win situation,” April 21) asking Gov. Martin O’Malley to veto House Bill 1168, which places a temporary moratorium on the construction of wind turbines in Somerset County, suffers from the misleading arguments often used by promoters of renewable power. First, wind speed on the Chesapeake Bay’s Eastern Shore is just adequate for commercial exploitation. The builders constantly refer to 150 megawatts of generation capacity, but this is the maximum or “nameplate” capacity, which is available only when the wind is strong. According to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s wind maps, the 25 turbines proposed for Somerset County will operate at about 30 percent of the maximum, or 45 MW.

The time that the Patuxent Naval Air Station’s staff will demand that the turbines be turned off will reduce it further. Over the course of a year, these turbines will produce only about 0.6 percent of Maryland’s electricity requirements.

This insignificant contribution does not justify even the remote risk that some future development at the station will make turning off the turbines too problematic to tolerate and the station might then be relocated.

Next, Messrs. Vinson and Burcat make two misleading generalities about the national contribution of wind to clean electricity generation. First, they state that the 61,000 MW of nameplate wind capacity now installed in the U.S. is equivalent to the nameplate capacity of 14 nuclear plants. This would true only if wind power were as reliable as nuclear, but it is not. The output of almost any wind turbine can be relied on only 30-to-40 percent of the time, but exactly when is unpredictable. Nuclear reactors, however, work 90 percent of the time, and most of their outages are planned in advance. Unplanned (“forced”) outages occur only about 2 percent of the time, or about 30 times less often than they occur with wind.

Finally, the authors make an overstated claim about wind’s contribution to new generating capacity. The only reason that new wind installations comprise 30 percent of all new generating capacity is because very little new generating capacity has been built recently in the U.S.

Governor O’Malley should sign the bill.

Norman Meadow, Baltimore

Source:  The Baltimore Sun | April 24, 2014 | www.baltimoresun.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky