[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Plans for wind turbine thrown out by councillors 

Credit:  By Jo Winrow, T&A Reporter | Telegraph & Argus | 23rd April 2014 | www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk ~~

Councillors have turned down plans for a 34-metre wind turbine in the green belt at Thornton amid fears the number of turbines in the vicinity is turning the area into a wind farm by the back door.

Bradford Council planning officers had recommended the scheme at 75 Back Heights Road, which was for a 50kw turbine on a 25 metre mast, be approved. But the majority of councillors at Bradford Planning Panel yesterday disagreed.

Four members voted against the plans, while two abstained.

Councillor Malcolm Sykes (Con, Thornton and Allerton) was particularly concerned about the scheme.

“For me this is inappropriate in the green belt and I don’t think there is sufficient mitigation to allow a wind turbine there.

“All these turbines will have a cumulative effect on that part of the moorland.

“When do all these wind turbines in the area become a windfarm, because there are so many of them now?”, he added.

Objectors told the panel about their fears over the constant noise like a washing machine permanently on, and over the possibility of shadow flicker.

They were also concerned that the distance to the nearest home outlined in the officer’s report was incorrect.

Planning officers detailed how an earlier application had been withdrawn due to concerns about the stability of the land and contamination issues as the location was a former landfill site. The application being considered yesterdayTUES had been moved to a different location, which was acceptable to planners.

They had also recommended a condition that sensors be installed to shut down the turbine when it faces a certain direction and the sunlight is such that shadow flicker is likely to occur.

There had been 24 letters objecting to the scheme and four letters in support.

Councillor Keith Dredge (Lab, Keighley West) added: “My concern is that we put a marker in the ground to prevent the cumulative effect of wind turbines in the area.”

The application was refused on the grounds that it was inappropriate development in the green belt and would have a significant impact – and that the very special circumstances required to justify granting planning permission within the green belt were not met.

Source:  By Jo Winrow, T&A Reporter | Telegraph & Argus | 23rd April 2014 | www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky