[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Congress challenges EPA over wind power “free pass to kill eagles” 

Credit:  By Jack Minor | Northern Colorado Gazette | Apr 3, 2014 | www.greeleygazette.com ~~

House Republicans are seeking information on whether the Obama administration is once again choosing which laws to enforce or not by granting what are essentially waivers to wind energy farms to kill eagles while fining oil and gas companies for similar deaths.

Forbes reported that on March 11, a subpoena was issued to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service by the House Natural Resources Committee over documents related to the Migratory Bird Act Treaty and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. The records requested include every case file for each incident that has occurred since 2009.

The issue came up as a result of recent revelations that the Obama administration was going to essentially be giving wind farms an exemption from the law for eagles that die from flying into the fast moving blades. The president has long heralded wind energy as an alternative to the current oil and gas industry.

The Los Angeles Times reported that the administration would be allowing some wind powered companies to kill or injure bald and golden eagles for up to 30 years without facing any penalties.

Under current law permits for wind farms are valid for five years during which if there is an excessive amount of eagle deaths they could face the possibility of not having their permits renewed. However, under the new rules the permits would be valid for 30 years .

National Audubon Society President David Yarnold said extending the permits to 30 years amounted to giving wind farms a free pass to kill eagles.

“Instead of balancing the need for conservation and renewable energy, Interior wrote the wind industry a blank check,” National Audubon Society President David Yarnold said in a statement. “It’s outrageous that the government is sanctioning the killing of America’s symbol, the bald eagle.”

Committee chairman Doc Hastings (R-Wash.) said they issued the subpoena last May and accused the agency of stonewalling Congress on the information in what is a “deliberate 10 month slow roll.”

“There are legitimate concerns that the administration is implementing these laws in an arbitrary fashion,” Hastings said. ”We are also interested in learning about what role cooperation between the administration and wind development plays in making these decisions.”

Dan Ash, director of the Fish and Wildlife Service said the reason for the delay is it just takes too much time to get the information since they must review each document to ensure there is not personal or confidential information in the reports. He went on to say he currently has 125 employees working on the subpoena. He told the committee last week that “The time you gave me to respond to that subpoena is completely unreasonable. We cannot physically respond to it.”

According to the Biological Conservation, windmills kill between 140,000 and 328,000 birds in the U.S. each year.

While the administration denies favoritism over whom it decides to prosecute over eagle deaths, the AP noted last May that the administration had not prosecuted a single wind farm for eagle deaths while prosecuting three oil companies.

After the story came out, the administration finally took action when it was announced in November that Duke Energy pled guilty to killing eagles and other birds at wind farms and paid a $1 million fine.

Source:  By Jack Minor | Northern Colorado Gazette | Apr 3, 2014 | www.greeleygazette.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon