LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Residents call for increased setback for wind turbines 

Credit:  Sueann Musick | The News | Published on March 18,2014 | www.ngnews.ca ~~

PICTOU – Residents of Millsville want county council to extend the distance a wind turbine must be from a home.

A large contingent of residents visited council chambers Monday asking that the setback for wind turbines be extended to 1.5 kilometres from 600 metres.

“We aren’t against alternative energy,” said resident Wayne Pierce. “We just want the setback extended.”

Their request came on the heels of the recent construction of a wind turbine on Tower Road in Millsville built by RMS Energy in Dalhousie Mountain.

RMS owner Ruben Burge told county council that the Millsville wind turbine is 750 metres from the closest home and about an average of 1,300 metres from all of the homes in the area.

RMS currently fills 2 1/2 per cent of the province’s need through his company. His largest wind project includes 34 wind turbines on Dalhousie Mountain.

He said his wind turbines are currently on about 99.6 per cent of the time and generate 100 per cent power about 40 per cent of the time.

Coun. Robert Parker said the main reason the residents are looking for a larger setback is because they are concerned more wind turbines could be erected in the area.

“The residents can accept one tower, but there might be a wind farm built up around them,” he said. “They are living with what’s up there now, but this is the main reason they are looking for a larger setback.”

County council agreed to refer the matter to its planning advisory committee which will come back with its recommendation.

Source:  Sueann Musick | The News | Published on March 18,2014 | www.ngnews.ca

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky