[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind deal status unclear after court ruling; Maine regulators ordered to re-examine decision  

Credit:  By DAVID SHARP Associated Press | First Posted: March 05, 2014 | www.greenfieldreporter.com ~~

A deal that gave Canadian utility Emera a stake in First Wind faces an uncertain future following a state supreme court ruling, the chairman of the Maine Public Utilities Commission said Wednesday.

The court ruled Tuesday that regulators must re-examine a deal in which Nova Scotia-based Emera invested more than $300 million to have a 49 percent stake in Boston-based First Wind’s Northeast project portfolio.

Emera is the corporate parent of Emera Maine, which includes the former Bangor Hydro-Electric Co. State law restrictions relationships between transmission companies and power producers to prevent favoritism of one power producer over another on the grid.

PUC Chairman Tom Welch said it will take several months for regulators to revisit the case and render a new decision. The status of the business deal in the interim is unclear, he said.

“It will be a challenge but we have the responsibility to come to some decision. We’ll work our way through it,” said Welch. He said the review process would likely begin anew this week.

Emera CEO Chris Huskilson expressed optimism Wednesday that the deal is legal both under the PUC’s original interpretation of the state law and under the court’s new interpretation of the law.

“Emera looks forward to participating in the commission’s process for redetermination of this matter and remains committed to investing in Maine,” he said in a statement from Halifax, Nova Scotia.

First Wind said it, too, remained committed to making the deal work.

The landscape has changed substantially in Maine since the days when electric deregulation became law in Maine, requiring Central Maine Power and Bangor Hydro to sell off their power generation assets.

Both CMP and Emera Maine are now owned by bigger companies with substantial holdings, including stakes in renewable energy. The difference is that CMP’s parent doesn’t have any wind projects in Maine, while Emera Maine’s corporate parent took a stake in a wind power company with seven projects in Maine.

The state supreme court didn’t issue a blanket decision that rules out business relationships between a power producer and a transmission and distribution company. But the court said such a deal should be rejected if it leads to a financial interest that provides incentive for a transmission and distribution company to favor certain power generators.

“The law court usually gives us deference but here they reached a different conclusion on the law,” Welch said.

Source:  By DAVID SHARP Associated Press | First Posted: March 05, 2014 | www.greenfieldreporter.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.