[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Legislation proposed to help landowners fight Clean Line project  

Credit:  By Mike Wiser | February 18, 2014 | wcfcourier.com ~~

DES MOINES | A House panel moved legislation that would make it easier for landowners to fight a proposed cross-state power line project Tuesday.

The Rock Island Clean Line is a 500-mile overhead high-voltage line that would carry electricity produced by wind turbines in northwestern Iowa across 16 Iowa counties to Illinois and points eastward.

It would run from O’Brien County across the state to Morris, Ill. In northeast Iowa, the company’s preferred route passes through Franklin, Butler, Grundy, Black Hawk, Buchanan and Benton counties to varying degrees.

It’s a privately backed venture that may have to take land by eminent domain if the company and landowners can’t come to agreements on terms.

Dozens of people – many of them wearing bright yellow shirts with the phrase “Stop RICL” printed on the front – packed a House conference room Tuesday morning in support of the legislation.

“I’m absolutely not against wind energy. I live in northwest Iowa where a number of our friends and people to the west of us have wind turbines,” said Carolyn Sheridan, a farmer from Greenville and leader of Preservation of Rural Iowa Alliance, which was founded in response to the Clean Line project.

“I am against this project. Rock Island intends to take wind energy from northwest Iowa for sale to people in Illinois, Pennsylvania and Massachusetts and other places,” she said.

The proposed bill requires the Iowa Utilities Board to consider “the extent to which electricity transmitted over or by the proposed transmission line will be used or consumed” in Iowa when determining power line routes when 5 percent or more of the landowners affected protest.

“We can’t have more wind energy in Iowa without having an outlet,” said Beth Soholt, executive director of Wind on the Wires, an advocacy group opposed to the bill. She compared the transmission lines that deliver electricity to the highways farmers use to transport livestock.

“It’s the road to market,” she said.

Hans Detwelier, director of development for Clean Line, said the compensation package being offered to landowners “is very robust” and, when all is taken into account, are generally “over 100 percent” of the fair market value of the land.

“I realize you are following the rules. You are going above and beyond. That is not in dispute,” said Rep. Bobby Kaufmann, R-Wilton, who drafted the bill.

Detwelier said the legislation is “contrary to Iowa’s tradition” of using its agriculture land to make money.

“Is Clean Line following the rules? Yes,” said Rep. Walt Rogers, R-Cedar Falls. “But is what is happening right? I don’t think so.”

The bill passed the subcommittee 2-1 with Rep. Dave Dawson, D-Sioux City, against it.

The House Democratic caucus sent out a news release shortly after the subcommittee saying Republicans were trying to kill wind energy in Iowa.

“The Clean Line project will bring $200 million to Sioux City and create or sustain hundreds of jobs,” Dawson said. “Rep. Kauffman’s bill will shut down this project as well as kill jobs and economic development.”

The bill needs to make it through a full committee this week if it is going to remain alive.

Judiciary chairman Rep. Chip Baltimore, R-Boone, said the legislation would be discussed Wednesday in caucus and possibly assigned to a committee before the end of the week.

“This project means a lot of money and a lot of jobs to a lot of people,” Baltimore said. “But we do have to find a balance with private property rights.”

Source:  By Mike Wiser | February 18, 2014 | wcfcourier.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: