[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Dominion Energy representative to share ridgeline plans at next Tazewell board meeting 

Credit:  By CHARLES OWENS | Bluefield Daily Telegraph | February 1, 2014 | www.bdtonline.com ~~

BLUEFIELD, Va. – A new developer has expressed an interest in 2,600 acres of land along East River Mountain currently owned by Dominion Energy, officials said Friday.

As a result of this new proposal, the Tazewell County Board of Supervisors are asking representatives of Dominion to appear before the board next week to provide an update on whether or not the company intends to proceed with a controversial wind turbine project along the scenic ridgeline.

Dominion purchased the property in 2009, and proposed the development of a large-scale wind turbine project along the ridgelines of East River Mountain. There was widespread opposition to the project in the county’s Eastern District, and the supervisors ultimately voted 3-2 to pass a ridgeline protection ordinance in 2010 restricting the development of tall structures along certain protected ridgelines, including East River Mountain. However, Dominion has yet to sell or relinquish its ownership of the property, according to board Chairman Charlie Stacy.

“We have reached out to them and asked them to provide us with an update on where that project stands,” Stacy said of the proposed wind turbine farm. “There have been several other developers interested in developing that tract of land. But they (Dominion) still own that 2,600 acres. Our question for them is where are they on their project. I’m probably the most scared as to what their answer is going to be. But several members of the board wanted them to come down and give us an update.”

Stacy said Dominion has indicated that a company representative will attend Tuesday’s meeting. The meeting starts at 6 p.m. But the board is then scheduled to adjourn into a closed-door executive session until 7:20 p.m., which is when the regular public session is scheduled to begin.

David Botkins, a spokesman for Dominion Virginia Power, also confirmed Friday that a company representative would address the board Tuesday.

“Emmett Toms, one of our local government affairs managers, will be coming out to provide the board with an update,” Botkins said. “He is just going to come out and give the board an update on our activity.”

Stacy said several other developers are now interested in the East River Mountain property.

“I have specifically spoken with one developer – and I don’t have his permission to disclose his idea – but I know the developer has expressed an interest,” Stacy said of the proposed non-wind turbine project for East River Mountain.

However, Stacy said nothing can happen on East River Mountain while Dominion still owns the property.

“It’s still a very unsettling issue up here,” Stacy said of the greater Bluefield, Va., area. “People want to know if that threat (of wind turbines on East River Mountain) still exists, or if it has gone away. My position is as long as Dominion Energy owns that property, we will have to remain suspicious that they are going to use it for the purpose that they bought it for.”

Stacy said he intends to introduce an ordinance later this year that would establish zoning for the Eastern District of Tazewell County.

“It is not a zoning ordinance for all of Tazewell County, but we have an option to zone by district,” Stacy said. “I have asked to do that as a further means of protecting against this project.”

Stacy said Dominion has yet to request an appeal or appearance before the appeals board that is overseeing the ridgeline protection ordinance, also known as the tall structure ordinance.

Source:  By CHARLES OWENS | Bluefield Daily Telegraph | February 1, 2014 | www.bdtonline.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky