LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Berkshire residents air concerns over commercial wind farms 

Credit:  By Dick Lindsay, Berkshire Eagle Staff | 01/28/2014 | www.berkshireeagle.com ~~

PITTSFIELD – Gov. Deval L. Patrick can’t be trusted to protect Western Massachusetts from unwanted, harmful commercial wind farms threatening the health and beauty of the region.

Dozens of Berkshire-area residents delivered that message Monday evening to state energy regulators gathering public input at Berkshire Community College on the best practices for siting land-based wind turbine projects across the commonwealth.

Later this spring, the state Department of Public Utilities plans to draft guidelines that won’t supersede existing local and state siting regulations, according to DPU officials.

“The department is not developing enforceable measures, but a guide to assist permitting authorities,” said James Buckley, attorney for the DPU Siting Division

However, the majority of the nearly 100 people attending the public hearing didn’t believe Buckley’s statement, claiming the pending guidelines are a ruse to resurrect the Wind Energy Siting Reform Act (WESRA) rejected by the state Legislature.

“The Patrick administration has earned our mistrust and fear,” said Eleanor Tillinghast of Green Berkshires. “The governor has used one tactic or another to push wind energy in our communities.”

“[WESRA] is zombie legislation that keeps stalking our communities,” added Cynthia Wick of Lenox.

Opponents to commercial wind energy facilities during the well over three-hour public hearing cited how the state and wind farm developers have ignored the environmental, economic and health impact of wind turbines. The most compelling testimony came from several people who live near the Hoosac Wind project in the town of Florida. The 19 turbines went on line in December 2012, and a month later town residents Nancy Shea and her husband Tim Danyliw moved out of their home.

Shea says they could no longer handle the noise and ill feeling, living 2,200 feet away from the closest turbine.

“It felt like the room was spinning,” she said. “It sounds like a jet engine over the house that doesn’t go away.”

Another neighbor to Hoosac Wind, Michael Fairneny, also feels the project has robbed his quality of life in the rural community.

“My happiness was taken away from my own home,” he said. “It’s like living next to an airport an [the planes] never land.”

In Peru, where a proposed wind energy project has polarized the town, some residents fear they will have a Hoosac Wind of their own.

“We care deeply about our property values, health and natural beauty,” said Bonnie DiTomasso.

Wind farm detractors also say the alternative energy source won’t impact the state’s plan to reduce reliance on fossil fuels.

In 2009, the Patrick administration called for 2,000 megawatts of wind capacity by 2020, 25 percent produced by onshore wind turbines. The goal is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 3.1 million tons from electricity produced by oil and natural gas.

Several speakers cited how wind energy has failed to meet the energy needs of Germany, Spain, parts of Canada, producing electricity well below projections.

Wind power just isn’t worth the hassle, according to Ellen Landauer of nearby Charlemont in Franklin County.

“Decommission all the wind turbines in the state, take them down and ban them forever,” she said.

Source:  By Dick Lindsay, Berkshire Eagle Staff | 01/28/2014 | www.berkshireeagle.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky