[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Clare Dakin tells of anger over Duddo Stone Circle wind turbine decision 

Credit:  By The Journal | 25 Jan 2014 | www.thejournal.co.uk ~~

A decision to allow a wind turbine close to the Duddo Stone Circle in Northumberland has dismayed campaigners :: Here Clare Dakin, on whose land the stones are situated, tells of her anger at the decision

Last summer I encountered several visitors to this rare and dazzling corner of England who remarked on the vandalism caused to this landscape by the Middlemoor and Wandylaw wind farms.

The general sentiment was that it was not so much the sight of the turbines they encountered as they were travelling along the A1 but the shock of the industrial change they imposed on what had been the rare and pristine open landscape views of our area asexperienced from the coastal area, particularly such as when on a trip to the Farne Islands.

On Monday – ironically for me renowned as Blue Monday, the most depressing day of the year – I received news that a planning application for the construction of a 74-metre high wind turbine, which I and others have fought hard to prevent, had been allowed on appeal.

The location is on high ground, perhaps 30 metres or more above the level of the main road from Berwick to Cornhill. It will be experienced by travellers as a structure over 320 feet high. It will stand as a beacon to “progress” for those travelling from Longridge to Tillmouth, an “Angel of Shoreswood”.

The structure itself is about four times the size of the Angel of the North. It is indeed a godsend for the applicant and he will be able to generate huge income from the machine in feed-in tariffs.

But those of us who have worked hard to nurture the beauty and special character of this area are weeping tears of anger and frustration. We are devastated by this outcome.

We know that this machine, on those clear and beautiful Northumbrian days of early summer, will stand as an insult in the landscape. It will distract the thoughts and contemplation of the many visitors to the Duddo Stone Circle who travel from far and wide to see this amazingly intact relic of bronze age life which has stood in a unique landscape setting for over 4,200 years.

As visitors to the Stone Circle make their pilgrimage on foot from the road to the circle sitting on its knoll they will see the fluted shapes of the stones on the horizon. Just to the right of that focus they will see a much more prominent turning machine.

“How could they allow that?” people will say. “The council should be ashamed,” is what we hear from visitors remarking on the other schemes.

Well, people of England and Northumberland, know this: it is not the council’s fault.

This development is happening because a planning appeal inspector (who happens to live in unspoilt North Yorkshire) say they think it is OK. Why, you might ask, is the inspector able to make this decision affecting our beautiful landscape? Well, search me.

I thought we lived in a democracy which was listening to publicconcern about the alleged but questionable environmental benefits of onshore wind turbines that cause the desecration of cherished landscapes.

Indeed I was thoroughly encouraged by the Planning Guidance for Renewable and Low Carbon Energy issued in July 2013 which is to be read by those administering Planning Legislation alongside other planning practice guidance and the National Planning Policy Framework.

It seems that the inspector did not read this, he does not refer to it in his decision which appears to fly in the face of that guidance. If he did read it then I consider his judgement to be deeply flawed and I do not think he is fit to make a decision of such hurtful significance to this or any other locality.

He acknowledges that the case is very finely balanced. Well, if it is so finely balanced, leave the status quo and don’t offend the many local people and visitors who are appalled by this outcome.

Source:  By The Journal | 25 Jan 2014 | www.thejournal.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky