[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Cockburnspath wind turbine legal challenge fails 

Credit:  BBC News | 17 January 2014 | www.bbc.co.uk/ ~~

A legal challenge to plans for two 110-metre wind turbines at a Borders beauty spot has been rejected by a judge.

The Court of Session in Edinburgh was told that the appeal, raised in the name of objector Sally Carroll, was the first of its type in Scotland.

It was taken against the Local Review Body of Scottish Borders Council.

It gave the project at Cockburnspath the go-ahead despite expert advice to the contrary but a judge ruled it was entitled to do so.

Lord Armstrong was told the site was on coastal farmland which was considered to be “highly sensitive”.

It is near the Berwickshire Coast and Lammermuir Hills Special Landscape Areas and the Southern Upland Way.

There are also two conservation areas close by.

‘Material considerations’

There have been three previous attempts to get planning permission for the wind turbines, going back to September 2010.

Current planning rules provide for a local authority to appoint someone – normally a planning officer – to examine the proposals.

The legislation also provides for a review of any decision by a local review body, which has wide discretion.

The objectors claimed that in this case there had been a failure to take into account “material considerations” and that the interpretation of relevant planning policies had not been properly carried out.

In his written ruling, Lord Armstrong said he had some sympathy for Ms Carroll who clearly felt strongly about the decision and its effect on her local community.

But, said the judge, it was ultimately a question of planning judgement.

Lord Armstrong said he was only there to determine the legality of the decision making process, not the arguments for and against the wind turbines.

Source:  BBC News | 17 January 2014 | www.bbc.co.uk/

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky