[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind energy bid sparks protests over Iron Age hill fort  

Credit:  Dartmouth Chronicle | 17 January 2014 | www.dartmouth-today.co.uk ~~

A plan to build a 159ft wind turbine next to an ancient hill fort near Dartmouth has provoked a wave of protests.
Campaigners claim that MicroGen’s plans to site the turbine at Bugford just over a mile outside the town will become an eyesore seen from miles around – harming the local tourist trade and the environment, including the important local bat population.
Protesters point out that the site for the turbine on part of Paddlelake Farm is just 200 yards from the Woodbury Iron Age hill fort site of great archaeological interest and are demanding that county archaeologist should be consulted.
The site is actually in the parish of Stoke Fleming and the parish council has joined protesters in objecting to the turbine project.
Last week half a dozen parish councillors carried out a site inspection of the hill where the West Sussex company behind the scheme wants to site the large turbine before recommending that the project should be rejected.
Stoke Fleming’s parish council chairman Jenny Farmer said: ‘We strongly object – mainly because it is in such a rural area and will be highly visible from so many areas.’
She said the parish councillors felt that the application was just the start of a number of applications which the parish will face – including one for a nearby solar farm.
‘We felt that enough was enough. It is right on the top of a hill, which is clearly where it would need to be. We felt that it was completely out of order.’
However, she warned that if South Hams Council backed the parish objections and threw the scheme out she felt sure the turbine development company would take the matter to appeal.

Source:  Dartmouth Chronicle | 17 January 2014 | www.dartmouth-today.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.