Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
New eagle rule should not fly
Credit: The Times-Tribune | Published: January 16, 2014 | thetimes-tribune.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Wind power is an important component of the ongoing effort to use less fossil fuel in favor of more renewable power sources. According to the Institute for Energy Research, wind power accounts for about 3.5 percent of all U.S. electricity generation.
The Obama administration properly advocates wind power and policy to accommodate its growth. But a new Department of the Interior rule, giving the industry a free pass for the deaths of bald and golden eagles, should be rescinded. Wind turbine operators would be allowed to accidentally kill eagles for up to 30 years without fear of federal prosecution.
Eagles no longer are covered under the Endangered Species Act, but they are protected under separate laws.
Under the rule, companies would have to take protective action if they kill or injure more eagles than they had estimated, or if eagle populations are adversely affected. The permits would be reviewed every five years, and companies would have to submit reports of how many eagles they kill. Now, such reporting is voluntary and, incredibly, the Interior Department refuses to release the data.
The rule itself begs the question: If operators have to establish additional protective measures if they kill too many eagles, why not just mandate those measures in the first place?
There is no exact data on eagle deaths. It is known that about 60 are killed each year in the massive Altamont Pass wind farm in California. Federal biologists last documented the deaths of 67 other eagles at wind farms since 2008, but noted that is far from a complete toll. In November, Duke Energy pleaded guilty to killing 14 eagles at wind farms it operates in Wyoming. And the Associated Press last year documented eagle deaths at several wind farms.
Rather than giving the industry a pass, the Department of the Interior should mandate use of all available technology to protect birds and that wind farm siting decisions take into account potential harm to eagle populations.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share: