[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

ZBA should honor majority vote in Peru 

Credit:  Berkshire Eagle | 01/12/2014 | www.berkshireeagle.com ~~

I’m writing to express my concerns as a voter in the town of Peru. On July 8 of last year, the town voted on an amendment to change the bylaw for wind development. The voters rejected a bylaw change that would have weakened the current standard we have with regard to noise. Record numbers of people attended The Special Town Meeting to vote. Prior to the vote a wind developer gave us his word that he would not go forward with a development under the current bylaw. A total of 55 percent of the voters decided to reject the bylaw amendment supported by the developer and town officials.

On Sept. 11, the developer filed for a variance to replace the current bylaw with his own standard, which just happens to be the standard rejected by town voters at the Special Town Meeting in July. Now, The Peru Zoning Board of Appeals is reviewing the request on behalf of the developer. It has the power to grant him the variance he seeks, even though the majority of voters do not support this standard.

Special Town Meeting votes carry as much weight as a City Council vote in larger communities. When Pittsfield’s City Council voted to establish zoning to make it difficult for a strip club to open in town, no club owners came forward to ask the Pittsfield Zoning Board of Appeals for a variance to open a club because they couldn’t meet the standards set forth in the bylaw, even if they appear to be unreasonable. This is exactly what the wind developer is trying to do in Peru. He can’t meet the standards that are set forth in our bylaw.

I urge the residents of Peru and surrounding communities that will be impacted to attend the Peru Zoning Board of Appeals public hearing to let them know how they feel about the variances being voted on. Please keep an eye out for upcoming dates.



Source:  Berkshire Eagle | 01/12/2014 | www.berkshireeagle.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky