[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Concerns continue over Hoosac Wind  

Credit:  By Jim Levulis | WAMC Northeast Public Radio | wamc.org ~~

Massachusetts residents living near a wind turbine farm in the Northern Berkshires are once again expressing concerns about noise pollution.

The so-called Hoosac Wind Project has raised concerns about noise pollution since it opened in December 2012. Iberdrola Renewables owns and operates the 19 turbines in the Berkshire County town of Florida and neighboring Franklin County town of Monroe. Larry Lorusso lives about a mile from the nearest turbine in the neighboring town of Clarksburg. He shares the concerns of a group called the Friends of Florida and Monroe who filed noise complaints with state officials in early 2013.

“It’s this very unnatural rhythm that’s not regular and it makes everything vibrate,” said Lorusso.

Lorusso says he has trouble sleeping one out of every ten nights and kept the windows closed in his house during the summer. Under state law, wind turbines must comply with regulations from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, by producing noise no louder than 10db above ambient sound. Under the requirement and oversight of the DEP, Iberdrola conducted a noise study in March. Ed Coletta is a DEP spokesman.

“For the Bakke Mountain site, none of the test samples that came back from Iberdrola were above the 10 db guideline that we have set out for our noise policy,” said Coletta.

Lorusso says he did not allow monitoring at his property because he wanted noise levels to be tested at locations closer to the turbines. He raised concerns about testing equipment being placed behind trees.

“It was noticeable, the difference,” Lorusso said. “Walking 25 feet from behind the tree, you could hear there was less sound behind the tree.”

Coletta says tests are conducted at multiple sites with readings taken every few seconds, hours at a time. He says the tests at Bakke Mountain showed no gaps.

“Any monitor that was placed out in the field was something where you were going to get a good set of data that would be utilized for this type of sampling,” Coletta said. “If there in fact were any kind of data points that were an issue that did show data gaps perhaps, then we would require them to go out and do more monitoring which we have required at the Crum Hill site.”

Lorusso also says Iberdrola has offered residents gag orders to keep quiet complaints about the project. Paul Copleman is the communications manager for Iberdrola.

“Our lease language with landowners in Massachusetts and with dozens of other projects across the country has no such language,” Copleman said. “We encourage all of our landowners at our projects to communicate with us and with others, including outside parties, if they have any concerns about the project operation.”

Lorusso says he wants the Hoosac Wind Project to comply with state regulations.

“I do not feel like they’re protecting us,” said Lorusso.

Democratic state representative Gailanne Cariddi represents the Berkshire towns of Florida and Clarksburg. She says she is supportive of a bill that would create a commission to look into the health concerns of those living near turbines. As a result of DEP testing, in November, a judge ordered the town of Falmouth to shut off two turbines it operates during evening hours and on major holidays. The DEP is currently overseeing the additional study at the Crum Hill site and will make those results available when the study is completed.

[audio available]

Source:  By Jim Levulis | WAMC Northeast Public Radio | wamc.org

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.