[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Federal rule change will harm eagles, charges local conservation group  

Credit:  East County Magazine | January 5, 2014 | eastcountymagazine.org ~~

In December, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) released its final decision to weaken a key rule that protects Bald and Golden Eagles, in order to more quickly develop renewable energy.

The Protect Our Communities Foundation (POC), a nonprofit community organization in San Diego’s East County, opposes this rule change stating it would harm eagles, has not been adequately studied, and violates federal law. Two local  wind projects would be affected by the change.

“Eagles symbolize America’s national heritage and deserve more protection, not less. This rule change will make it harder to protect the remaining eagles that San Diegans love,” said Donna Tisdale, POC’s Secretary.

“If you increase the length of eagle take permits from five years to 30 years, common sense says there are going to be some effects on eagles. But the federal government didn’t study the impacts of this rule change even though the National Environmental Policy Act requires it. Instead, the feds have decided to break the law and use eagles as lab rats,” said Kelly Fuller, consultant to The Protect Our Communities Foundation. Fuller was formerly the Wind Campaign Coordinator at American Bird Conservancy in Washington, D.C.  “According to the FWS’s own Eagle Conservation Plan Guidance, there are no proven measures that will reduce the numbers of eagles killed once the wind turbines are installed,” she added. “This rule change is a disaster.”

Before the rule change, FWS offered programmatic eagle take permits that would allow companies to kill specified numbers of eagles at their facilities for up to five years, as long as those deaths were unintentional and measures were taken to reduce and offset the deaths. The rule change allows permits to last for up to 30 years. When FWS first made these permits available in 2009, it said that permits would be limited to five years or less because longer permits could be incompatible with the preservation of eagles.

Under the old system, the permits could be renewed after five years unless there was reason to not to renew them. The rule change abandons the every-five-years-renewal process in favor of longer permits, thus removing the public’s opportunity to help protect eagles by commenting at the time of permit renewal.

POC sent comments to FWS opposing 30-year eagle take permits in July 2012. More than 120 other groups also wrote to FWS criticizing the rule change, including the National Park Service, major conservation groups, and tribal organizations.

In San Diego and Imperial Counties, this rule change could affect the proposed Tule Wind Project and existing Ocotillo Express Wind Energy Facility:

1.      The Avian Bat Protection Plan for Phase II of the proposed Tule Wind Project states that the project will apply for an eagle take permit before it begins operation. A memo obtained by POC through a Freedom of Information Act request shows that FWS regards Phase II of the Project as high risk to Golden Eagles and thinks that it “would likely cause ongoing mortality of eagles and their offspring.” As a result, FWS asked that Phase II be redesigned or moved to another location.

2.      The Eagle Conservation Plan for the Ocotillo Express Wind Energy Facility says that if the project kills a Golden Eagle, the project will discuss with FWS whether to apply for an eagle take permit. Please note, the Bald and Golden Protection Act strictly forbids killing eagles without an eagle take permit, so the Project would have already broken the law.

“This rule change isn’t needed because we don’t have to choose between protecting eagles and developing clean energy. We can do both. There are clean energy alternatives that are less harmful to eagles, such as rooftop solar and energy efficiency,” said Bill Powers, an energy expert who is a member of the POC Board of Directors.

The rule change is particularly troubling given that David Bittner, the eagle “expert” hired by the wind energy companies, concluded the project would not pose serious dangers to eagles. Bittner was recently convicted in federal court on charges related to his mishandling of eagles, lack of permits, and failure to turn over tracking data to federal wildlife officials.

The FWS memo characterizing Phase II of the Tule Wind project as high risk to Golden Eagles is available at http://protectourcommunities.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/usfws_memo_abpp_tulewind_phaseii.

The Eagle Conservation Plan for the Ocotillo Express wind project is available at http://www.blm.gov/pgdata/etc/medialib/blm/ca/pdf/elcentro/nepa/ocotilloexpress/feis.Par.48467.File.dat/AppL9.pdf.

2009 Eagle Take Permit Rule (see page 46856 for statement limiting eagle take permits to five years): http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2009-09-11/pdf/E9-21589.pdf

Source:  East County Magazine | January 5, 2014 | eastcountymagazine.org

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.