Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
New Hampshire bills target Northern Pass, wind projects
Credit: House to start 2014 with Northern Pass, wind project votes | N.H. bills target Northern Pass, wind projects | Associated Press | January 1, 2014 | www.concordmonitor.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
New Hampshire’s House is starting the New Year with votes on legislation that would put limits on energy projects such as wind turbines and Northern Pass.
The House Science, Technology and Energy Committee is recommending passing one bill that would direct the state’s site evaluation committee to give preference in issuing permits to privately funded energy projects such as Northern Pass if they bury their transmission lines.
State Rep. Laurence Rappaport said the bill is designed to lessen the likelihood that New Hampshire residents will suffer the visual impact of transmission lines carrying power to southern New England. He said that while New Hampshire planned for its future energy needs, other states have not. He said New Hampshire residents should not suffer for their lack of planning.
State Rep. Jacqueline Cali-Pitts criticized the bill as interfering with the site evaluation committee’s decision-making. She said the bill also could stifle development of new renewable energy sources, though Rappaport said the bill would not affect small renewable energy projects that the state may need to achieve its goal of 25 percent renewable energy by 2025.
Northern Pass is a $1.4 billion project that would transmit 1,200 megawatts of Canadian hydroelectric power, enough to serve 1.2 million homes, from Hydro-Quebec into New England. Opponents say the transmission towers would damage the environment, lower property values and hurt tourism. Supporters say the power would reduce carbon emissions.
[. . .]
The committee also issued a split recommendation on a bill to establish a moratorium on wind turbine plants and electric transmission line projects. A committee majority recommended killing the bill since the process to site projects is being reviewed. Supporters say a moratorium is needed until the state issues a comprehensive energy plan.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share: