[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm applicant to appeal denial 

Credit:  Warwick Daily News | 29th Nov 2013 | www.warwickdailynews.com.au ~~

Dalveen wind farm proponent Tim Lucas says he still plans to appeal the Southern Downs Regional Council’s refusal of the plan even though nothing has been formally lodged yet with the courts.

The wind farm was knocked back by the council at its October meeting, after scores of residents objected to eight wind turbines being located at the proposed site on Rabbit Ridge Rd.

Mr Lucas has until close of business today to lodge an appeal with the Planning and Environment Court of Queensland and told the Daily News he was confident it would proceed.

Councils normally try to deal with planning appeals outside of court through mediation to avoid a full-blown court hearing, which can be costly for ratepayers.

Mr Lucas said of the 71 objectors, only eight lived within 2km of the site.

He was confident noise assessments, carried out as part of the application to the council, would stand up in court.

He also said the turbines would be a tourist attraction, as well as a source of renewable energy for Stanthorpe.

Among the main concerns shared by residents was the potential for excess noise and the resultant impact on lifestyle and property values.

Leading the “no” case in the council was Cr Jamie Mackenzie, who said while the windmill was an icon of rural Australia, the proposal was for turbines 10-15 times above the tree canopy “with noise impacts that cannot be satisfactorily attenuated”.

“If we have to have wind farms, let’s have them in windy, remote locations, not in a neighbourhood of small rural lots,” Cr Mackenzie said.

He recommended the application be refused as it was contrary to the strategic provisions of the planning scheme.

“No conditions could be imposed to mitigate negative amenity impacts of wind turbines,” Cr Mackenzie said.

“It would also create an undesirable precedent for high impact renewable energy developments in comparatively densely settled rural areas.”

Source:  Warwick Daily News | 29th Nov 2013 | www.warwickdailynews.com.au

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky