[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Funding crunch scuttles wind-farm plan  

Credit:  By Cassie Werber | The Wall Street Journal | Nov. 26, 2013 | wsj.com ~~

LONDON—A major European utility said Tuesday it would scrap a wind farm that was due to become the largest offshore wind project ever built, a sign of the struggles the industry is having in attracting investment.

The Atlantic Array, in the Bristol Channel off the west coast of England, could have generated up to 1,200 megawatts of electricity, almost twice as much as the largest farm operating in U.K. waters. But RWE said that continuing with the project faced problems that were “prohibitive in current market conditions.”

RWE’s decision highlights the central difficulty in achieving Europe’s wind targets. Huge projects are planned, but few investors are willing to stake the billions needed to build them in an environment where government subsidies are essential but uncertain and costs can skyrocket.

The U.K. has pioneered offshore wind power, maximizing its island status with more turbines than any other country, but some investors have balked at the relatively new technology and the cash outlay needed for the next phase of development.

“You worry at the moment, when [offshore] is very expensive, and relies on a long-term government contract at a very high price. And you also don’t know how it’s going to be to operate in very harsh conditions” out at sea, said Emma Tinker of private-equity firm HgCapital, a long-established investor in renewable energy.

Investors are essential to offshore wind’s future. The U.K. is planning to increase offshore-wind energy production from 3.65 gigawatts now—enough to power 2.5 million homes—to 39 gigawatts in a construction phase stretching out to 2030. But the financial outlay is huge: £37 billion ($60 billion) is needed to achieve 16 gigawatts, or less than half the total, according to industry body Renewable U.K.

HgCapital, which has £5.6 billion under management, is putting its money into onshore wind and solar, technologies that could be competitive with fossil-fuel power and “shouldn’t need cash subsidies” within five years, according to Ms. Tinker. The high cost of building offshore wind generation, by contrast, means that government support is required to make the price competitive.

Utilities have historically funded the building of energy-producing facilities. But the expense of technologies like offshore wind is driving them to seek a wider range of investment.

“The utility industry is not able to fuel the capital needs for the growing offshore industry on its own. We need to tap into new sources of capital,” said Samuel Leupold, head of wind power for Dong Energy.

Dong has already committed a lot of money to European projects. This month it said it would pour €2.2 billion ($2.97 billion) into two German offshore projects, and it has invested €3.5 billion in U.K. offshore wind farms. Outside investors have taken stakes worth €2.5 billion in the company’s already built farms.

Finding investors to finance construction is much harder.

“You have to spend a huge amount of money before the first turbine starts to turn…You could have a couple of years where you have hundreds of millions of pounds out and no return,” said Richard Nourse, managing partner at Greencoat UK Wind, an infrastructure fund that invests solely in British wind farms but won’t risk money on building offshore installations.

Greencoat did buy part of the Rhyl Flats Offshore Wind Farm, off the coast of north Wales, from RWE, but only when it was up and running. “We tell our investors, day one, that we own the asset, it’s turning, and the proposition to investors is about a good, safe, growing income,” Mr. Nourse said.

To make matters worse, the bounty of cheap oil and gas from U.S. shale has made renewable energy even less competitive.

Advocates of green energy say sticking with fossil fuels is a short-term plan. But the market preference for cheaper alternatives means only government can force through plans for new, expensive technologies.

Of these, offshore wind is arguably the priciest, and uncertainty over how subsidies will work is another reason for investors hanging back.New energy legislation, due to pass in the U.K. before year’s end, might provide some clarity. But utilities remain concerned.

Source:  By Cassie Werber | The Wall Street Journal | Nov. 26, 2013 | wsj.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.