LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Village makes clear its stance on windfarm 

Credit:  Northumberland Gazette | 21 November 2013 | www.northumberlandgazette.co.uk ~~

A nine-turbine windfarm at Belford Burn would be an ‘appalling scar’ on the landscape, according to nearby residents and some tourists.

Representatives from applicant Energiekontor and Northumberland County Council’s planning department were left in no doubt as to the strength of feeling against the development at a public meeting on Monday.

Lord Walton, of Detchant, said that the Middlemoor and Wandylaw windfarms were a ‘lesson to us all’ and claimed that irrevocable damage had been caused to the landscape.

“I’m not opposed in general to applications for renewable energy in the right place, but I am opposed to this application,” he said. “The reason I’m opposed to this application is because it’s going to be another appalling scar on some of the most beautiful countryside in Northumberland, and indeed the whole of England.”

Energiekontor said that there were only six households within two kilometres of the proposed site. But Bridget Smith, who lives a mile from Belford Burn, said: “Do you know what it’s like to live with this threat looming over you?

“There’s a pit of dread in you all the time thinking what it will do to your home, your environment. You have seen the effect of Middlemoor and Wandylaw – you can see it from all around.”

Belford Golf Club owner Michael Ratliff added: “There have been 447 submissions made against this application, and only eight in favour of it.

“What weight does the council give to this in a democratic process? The weight of public opinion in this area could not be more heavily stacked against this proposal and we will not stand for it!”

Other concerns raised included the ecological impact, the proposed transport route through the village to deliver turbine components and the effect on the MoD radar systems at Brizlee Wood.

Energiekontor project manager, Michael Briggs, said that it had been identified as a good site for a windfarm because wind speed was very high and there was a relatively large set-back from nearby neighbours.

Source:  Northumberland Gazette | 21 November 2013 | www.northumberlandgazette.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky