LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Winchester planners back wind mast on proposed 14-turbine site at Bullington Cross 

Credit:  By Andrew Napier | This is Hampshire | 19th November 2013 | www.thisishampshire.net ~~

Permission has been granted for an 80-metre tall mast to measure wind on the site of a controversial proposed wind farm in Hampshire.

Winchester city councillors have approved the plan by EDF Renewables on farmland near Bullington Cross.

EDF says they need the mast to gather data to allow them to decide the final design of their 14-turbine wind farm proposed for the land near Freefolk Wood.

A planning application on the 14 turbines is due before Winchester planners next March.

Cllr Barry Lipscomb told the planning committee: “I’m surprised this has not come in earlier. I had thought we needed this to consider the turbine application. I learn today the data is only going to be needed for the later design of the turbines. I wonder whether we need to have this until such time as we may have approved the main application?

“If this mast is not needed to provide essential evidence for the turbine application I’m not convinced it should go up.”

He said he had concerns about the low-flying Chinooks that operate at night between Winchester and RAF Odiham. But planning officer David Dimon said the Ministry of Defence had raised no concerns.

Cllr Kim Gottlieb said he was suspicious of EDF: “I think we should be questioning their motives, particularly as they already know this is a windy place. Why are we looking at this now when they have already decided to go ahead and put in an application? What other reason could there be? It sets a precedent with an intrusion into that space.”

Cllr David McLean said: “It is a temporary structure. If it helps resolve that the final design may be I think we should grant this.”

The committee voted by eight votes to two to grant temporary permission for three years.

Source:  By Andrew Napier | This is Hampshire | 19th November 2013 | www.thisishampshire.net

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky