LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Bats at the centre of turbine row 

Credit:  By Richard Wright | Isle of Wight County Press | November 15, 2013 | www.iwcp.co.uk ~~

A battle of the bats has broken out over the effect wind turbines in Parkhurst may have on rare species.

With just days to go before the closing date for representations on the plan for two turbines, an expert consultant employed by the applicant, Partnerships for Renewables (PfR), has disputed findings supported by the Isle of Wight Council senior ecology officer, Dr Colin Pope.

Opponents claim bird and bat populations could be badly affected by turbine blades and Dr Pope contended that, based on current understanding, barbastelle, noctule and leisler’s bat populations could be harmed.

Dr Jon Whitehurst, a member of the Bat Conservation Trust, produced the study leading to Dr Pope’s conclusion.

Dr Whitehurst, who lives at Noke Common, is one of the many objectors to the pair of 125- metre tall turbines on prison land near the closed Camp Hill Prison, on the fringe of Parkhurst Forest.

He concluded the effect on 14 different species – including an internationally significant, and thriving, barbstelle bat population – needed much more research.

But consultant for PfR, Dr Lynn Whitfield, challenged the methodology and said her survey, conducted over three years, showed bats rarely used the open-field habitat, where the turbines would be sited.

She understood Natural England had accepted monitoring the effects of measures to protect bats when the turbines were built was a reasonable approach.

A major study would be published next year on the effects of wind turbines on UK bats.

A PfR spokesman said: “With the proposed mitigation such as “stand-off” from Parkhurst Forest, scrub clearance and post-construction monitoring, the predicted effect of the turbines on local bat populations is still considered not to be significant in environmental impact assessment terms.”

The closing date for representations is today (Friday).

Source:  By Richard Wright | Isle of Wight County Press | November 15, 2013 | www.iwcp.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky