[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Peru wind energy moratorium falls short  

Credit:  By Phil Demers, Berkshire Eagle Staff | 11/06/2013 | www.berkshireeagle.com ~~

PERU – A majority of voters supported a two-year moratorium on wind energy projects, but not enough to carry the measure through.

The initiative failed to reach the required two-thirds vote at a special town meeting Monday as residents split 157 in favor to 109 against a moratorium.

The meeting began at 6:30 p.m. and included a moderated comment period and subsequent vote. It wrapped up shortly after 8 p.m.

In recent weeks, the proposed ban has proven a contentious issue in town.

“If everyone spoke (Monday), we would have been there until midnight,” said Peru Select Board Chairman Douglas Haskins Sr. “But all the questions had been asked and it was time to vote.”

Haskins said he expected the measure to pass, especially since the wind energy company, Lightship Energy, is seeking a permit to build five 500-foot turbines between Haskell and Garnet hills off Curtin Road. The moratorium would have stopped Lightship from advancing their plans any further.

But now Haskins, who’s also a member of the town planning and zoning boards, expects to hear from the company inside the next few weeks. Lightship must next receive a special permit from the zoning board.

“The process will play out publicly, and all I can say is 59 percent of the town is opposed,” said resident John DiTomasso, who established the website garnethillwind.com to inform people about proposed development. “I’m sure there’s going to be a tremendous amount of interest.”

Proponents of wind energy in the town say Lightship’s proposal could net the town $150,000 per year in tax revenue while promoting green energy.

Opponents are concerned about whether industrial-sized turbines cause those who live nearby to suffer ill health effects like vertigo, nausea, headaches and sleep interruption. Such effects have been observed among residents in other places, like Falmouth, where industrial turbines were allowed. Roughly 40 houses fall within a mile of the proposed building site, the closest separated by 1,650 feet.

Source:  By Phil Demers, Berkshire Eagle Staff | 11/06/2013 | www.berkshireeagle.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.