LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

SNH say windfarm extension can be accommodated if turbines are reduced 

Credit:  Stornoway Gazette | 29 October 2013 | www.stornowaygazette.co.uk ~~

Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) has advised that a proposed 12-turbine extension to a windfarm on a Lewis estate could be accommodated if six turbines are removed.

They believe the proposal for the Muaitheabhal Windfarm south extension as it stands would have an adverse effect on the integrity of the South Lewis, Harris and North Uist National Scenic Area (NSA) and on wild land.

However this impact could be addressed by reducing the number of turbines by six.

This would meet the Scottish Planning Policy requirement to demonstrate the proposal would not significantly and adversely affect designated areas, wild land or protected species.

SNH say the proposal for 12 turbines would affect white tailed eagles and golden eagles, however a six turbine scheme, taken in conjunction with existing and consented windfarms in the area, is unlikely to threaten overall populations of the two species.

Andrew Bachell, SNH’s Director of Operations, said: “Due to the likely impact of the 12 turbine proposal we have advised that turbines numbered one to six and their associated infrastructure, including the proposed substation near turbine six, be removed.

“This would reduce the impacts sufficiently that we would not object to the proposal.”

Source:  Stornoway Gazette | 29 October 2013 | www.stornowaygazette.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky