[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind case for compensation 

Credit:  By KATHARYN BRINE | Yass Tribune | Oct. 18, 2013 | www.yasstribune.com.au ~~

Wind turbines devalue adjoining properties by as much as 60 per cent, according to an independent land valuer’s report issued this week.

It found offers by some wind farm developers to compensate landowners within two kilometres of turbines appeared to support this finding too.

Goulburn real estate consultant and registered valuer Peter Reardon made the findings after being commissioned by farmer Paul Vallely, a member of the Community Consultative Committee for the Golspie Wind Farm development.

Previous reports on the impact of turbines on property values, including a report for the NSW Valuer General, have concluded there was no evidence rural land holdings were impaired by wind turbine development.

However Mr Reardon’s report said previous studies had been inconclusive because of the relative new age of wind infrastructure.

Mr Reardon surveyed a number of real estate agents in the region and found most of them believed location and proximity to wind turbines significantly devalued the marketability of rural land holdings. Buyers were losing interest and sellers needed to extend sale periods on affected listings.

The study looked at the sales figures of three affected properties and four or five comparable land sales. It found one property sold for a 33 per cent loss compared to its counterparts, another for a 60 per cent loss and the third property remained stable with no change in value.

“The detrimental impact upon adjoining and nearby land-holders appears to be beginning to be acknowledged by a number of wind turbine proponents,” the report said.

“A noteable example of this is developers in the Boorowa/Rugby region. Enquiries have detailed that compensation deals are being offered to adjoining and nearby land holders who have a residence within two kilometres of wind turbines.”

Deals struck so far are typically $2500 per annum for each turbine located within two kilometres, indexed for the life of the development.

It is similar to agreements between landowners who host turbines on their farms, the report said.

Hume MP Angus Taylor said the study showed a clear case for wind farm developers to compensate landowners and local communities.

“The study shows potentially dramatic negative impacts on the value of property located near wind farms,” Mr Taylor said.

“Agents have been forced to brand some properties as virtually unsaleable, in other instances agreed sales have failed to proceed after the purchasers have become aware of local wind farm plans.

“This is a clear case for compensation to the non-host landowners. These losses in real estate value completely overwhelm the small amounts of financial assistance being offered by developers to local communities living near the turbines.”

There are 12 homes situated within a two kilometre radius of Epuron’s Yass Valley and Conroys Gap wind farms.

Within a five kilometre distance, there were 95 and 31 respectively, according to Epuron’s Community Consultation Committee September minutes.

A spokesman for Epuron was unavailable to comment on whether these landowners would be offered compensation.*****

But an opponent to wind farms in our area, Mike Inkster, believes wind developers were compensating non-host landowners for reasons other than property devaluation. He said they were making the offers merely as a way to get around state guidelines which require turbines to be more than two kilometres from residences unless written consent is given.

“It’s a business proposition,” he said.

“I’m not sure property devaluation is why they are doing it – I don’t believe they care. They aren’t in it for the community, they are in it to make money.”

The Reardon report can be found online http://docs.wind-watch.org/Reardon_Impact-of-Wind-Farm-Development-on-Land-Values_2013.pdf

Source:  By KATHARYN BRINE | Yass Tribune | Oct. 18, 2013 | www.yasstribune.com.au

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tag: Complaints

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky