[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Battle lines are drawn as inquiry into wind turbine gets under way  

Credit:  Amy Smith | Eastern Daily Press | Wednesday, October 16, 2013 | www.edp24.co.uk ~~

It was standing room only as a public inquiry into a controversial application to build a 125-metre high wind turbine on a farm at Barsham, near Beccles, got under way.

Waveney District Council refused Stamford Renewables’ application to build the 2MW turbine on land at Laurels Farm in March on noise and visual impact grounds, having previously refused applications to build three and then two turbines on the site.

However Stamford Renewables appealed the decision, and yesterday government inspector Robert Mellor launched an inquiry to decide if the application should go ahead.

Mr Mellor said the issues he would be looking at were the effect the turbine would have on the landscape, on the living conditions of the nearby residents and noise and whether any identified harm in these respects would be outweighed by any benefits.

Speaking for Waveney council, Jonathan Clay said the turbine would be the tallest structure in the landscape for miles and the effect on the natural beauty of the Broads and the enjoyment of them should be a major issue in the appeal.

He added: “The development will contribute 2MW to the National Grid. It is an immeasurably small contribution and will make no measurable contribution to reducing climate change.

“This is a case where the development will cause substantial damage to a landscape of national importance, with consequent damage to recreational enjoyment of it and the quality of life of residents.”

Speaking on behalf of Stamford Renewables, Jeremy Pike said the landscape surrounding the site was not more special or noteworthy than other landscapes in which turbines of the same size have been built. He said the visual effects close to the site would be significant but the effect on the wider landscape was not likely to be significant.

He added: “The pressing need for more onshore renewables provision cannot be doubted or challenged.

“There are few if any other new renewables proposals coming forward in this district to meet the targets. In this context the relatively limited impacts resulting from this proposed turbine, upon landscape and visual amenity in the local area, including a very small part of the Broads, is something which can and should be considered acceptable.”

Residents’ opposition group HALT was represented by Geoffrey Sinclair who said that in terms of relevant planning policy the energy benefits did not outweigh the significant harm that would result.

The inquiry, at Belsey Bridge Conference Centre in Ditchingham, is due to continue until Friday.

Source:  Amy Smith | Eastern Daily Press | Wednesday, October 16, 2013 | www.edp24.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.