LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm near Kimbolton rejected – for the second time 

Credit:  Written by EDWARD CURWEN | News & Crier | 17 September 2013 | www.cambridge-news.co.uk ~~

Campaigners cheered from packed public galleries last night (September 16), as councillors rejected proposals for a new three-turbine wind farm on an old Second World War airfield near Kimbolton.

The plans, submitted by Broadview Energy to Huntingdonshire District Council were unanimously rejected after impassioned pleas from the people of surrounding villages, and a highly critical planning officers report.

Richard Murphy, Chairman of the STOP Bicton Wind farm Campaign, said: “I think what we’re very pleased about is that the panel have listened to the local voice. We’re pleased that they have listened and they have responded.

“There are so many more wind farms here than there were, but most importantly, we have a solar farm there which, as a local community, we all supported, and a lot of people don’t know it’s up there.”

It is not the first time an application for a wind farm at Bicton, near Kimbolton, has been proposed. A four-turbine scheme was rejected by councillors, and, after an appeal by Broadview Energy, a national planning inspector.

The new proposal moved two turbines away from Kimbolton castle, but closer to the village of Stow Longa.

Mr Murphy said: “Over all when you look at what Broadview have done, or rather what they have not done, is to significantly change the plans.

“They’re grasping at technical straws in my opinion. What they’ve not done is look at the spirit of the inspectors report.”

Tom Cosgrove spoke to councillors on behalf of Broadview Energy.

He argued that the original application had been rejected because of the location or two turbines. Broadview removed one and moved the other further north, which they felt addressed the concerns raised in the planning inspector’s report.

He also pointed out that wind turbines – along with other renewable enegry sources – were needed to address the “serious energy gap” the UK faces and to “ensure the lights stay on.”

Broadview can appeal the decision.

Mr Cosgrove said: “We are currently considering our options.”

Source:  Written by EDWARD CURWEN | News & Crier | 17 September 2013 | www.cambridge-news.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky