[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

UK onshore progress despite government community pledge 

Credit:  13 August 2013 by Catherine Early, windpowermonthly.com ~~

Two thirds of appeals against onshore wind farm refusals in England have been approved despite a government pledge that communities would have more power to block applications.

Data from the Planning Inspectorate – which rules on appeals by developers against local councils refusing projects – show that nine out of 14 wind farms have been given the go ahead since 6 June. Back then, the Conservative minister in charge of permitting, Eric Pickles, said that the need for renewable energy would not “automatically override environmental protections and concerns of local communities”.

At the time, many in the industry pointed out that the permitting system already takes protection of the countryside and local people’s views into account. However, national media reported that the announcement amounted to a veto over wind farms for communities.

Letters from inspectors ruling on appeals confirm that Pickles’ statement did not represent a change in policy.

One regarding an application for a 9MW wind farm in Cambridgeshire, south-east England, said: “National policy has not been changed by the recent ministerial statements, and the approach to decision-making continues to require a balance to be struck between harm and benefit. This is addressed throughout the decision.”

However, Pickles has personally taken over decisions on seven wind farm applications from the Planning Inspectorate. Six of these are in the constituencies of fellow Conservative Party politicians, all of whom have actively campaigned against the wind farms in question. The politicians include former energy minister John Hayes, who caused controversy last year when he said “enough was enough” on onshore wind. Final decisions on these appeals are yet to be made.

At the end of July, the government issued revised guidance for local councils on permitting for onshore wind applications. It states that they cannot specify blanket separation distances between homes and wind farms, but must look at applications on a case-by-case basis. At least nine councils were considering such policies.

Developer RWE Npower Renewables was at the centre of a high court case on buffer zones earlier this year after Milton Keynes council tried to introduce a two-kilometre distance between any wind farms and homes. The court ruled in the developer’s favour but left the door open for other councils to introduce similar rules.

An RWE spokesman said: “This clearly shows that the way forward is – as it has always been – that impacts are to be judged on the site-specific merits of any individual scheme. We are sure that decision makers and planning inspectors will take note of this.”

The guidance also states that councils should identify suitable areas for renewable energy to give greater certainty as to where development will be permitted. They should not have to give permission outside these areas when they judge the impact to be unacceptable.

“The expectation should always be that an application should only be approved if the impact is (or can be made) acceptable,” the guidance states.

Maf Smith, deputy chief executive of trade body RenewableUK, said: “Following a long debate about onshore wind costs and benefits, we trust that this period of uncertainty for the industry is now at an end, and that we will see planning policy and guidance producing robust, objective planning decisions.”

Source:  13 August 2013 by Catherine Early, windpowermonthly.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky