[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Nebraska Supreme Court reverses lower decision on tax credits for wind farm  

Credit:  By Joe Duggan / World-Herald Bureau | August 2, 2013 | www.omaha.com ~~

LINCOLN – The Nebraska Supreme Court reversed a lower court ruling Friday that had struck down property tax credits for a Knox County wind farm.

The high court determined that a 2010 state law intended to encourage wind farm development in Nebraska did not violate the constitution.

The law replaced personal property tax on wind farm equipment with a tax on the megawatt capacity of the facilities. The replacement tax is called a nameplate capacity tax, and it helps spread out the upfront costs of building the farms over a longer period of time.

The nameplate capacity tax applies only to privately developed wind farms.

When the law took effect, Elkhorn Ridge Wind Farm near Bloomfield was the state’s only facility in private ownership. In 2009, Elkhorn Ridge paid $1.6 million in personal property tax.

So lawmakers included a provision in the 2010 law to give Elkhorn Ridge credits for future nameplate capacity taxes. Senators decided that it would be unfair to the business to have to pay both property tax and the new capacity tax.

The Knox County Board of Supervisors sued Gov. Dave Heineman and other state officials over the new law.

Last year, Lancaster County District Judge Paul Merritt Jr. struck down the credits for Elkhorn Ridge as an unconstitutional “commutation” of property taxes.

The high court disagreed, saying the nameplate capacity tax substituted for property taxes, it didn’t eliminate them. In addition, the high court ruled the 2010 law did not constitute special legislation, and it ordered the lawsuit dismissed.

The Attorney General’s Office represented the state in the matter. Omaha attorney David Domina represented the county supervisors.

Source:  By Joe Duggan / World-Herald Bureau | August 2, 2013 | www.omaha.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: