LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm developer takes case to Tiverton 

Credit:  By Kevin P. O'Connor, Herald News Staff Reporter | Posted Jul 30, 2013 | www.heraldnews.com ~~

TIVERTON – Wind turbines could be up and spinning in two years if the town signs on to wind energy, a developer told the Town Council on Monday night.

Power generated by six to eight turbines could provide up to 24 megawatts of electricity – enough to power thousands of homes – and would generate lease payments of $8 million over 25 years to the town’s two water districts, according to Chris Swartley, vice president of project development for Apex Clean Energy. The town would also collect taxes from the facility, he said.

But, as several speakers noted, Tiverton residents need only look across the Mount Hope Bay to see a cautionary tale. The $1 million turbine owned by the town of Portsmouth, R.I., is broken and stalled and visible on the western horizon.

“Those of us who have been around for a while have seen the saga of wind energy in Tiverton,” Council President Edward Roderick said. “It has been a long process.

“That said, we need to do something about renewable energy. We can’t let this pass us by.”

The council met Monday in a workshop to discuss the idea that Tiverton should develop a wind farm on its own.

The meeting came after Garry Plunkett, a proponent for wind energy, told the council in May that the East Bay Energy Consortium that was looking at a group project to develop a wind farm was all but dead. Tiverton was one of nine East Bay towns that made up EBEC.

“It is great to know wind energy is still on the table,” Plunkett said. “This is, perhaps, the beginning of the Tiverton plan, the one we design for Tiverton only.”

Swartley and Apex Clean Energy was a consultant to EBEC, and it has drawn up preliminary plans for the wind farm EBEC proposed for Tiverton in land owned by the Stone Bridge Fire District and the North Tiverton Fire District – the two quasi-public agencies that provide drinking water to the town.

That land is viable, Plunkett and Swartley told the council, because it has consistent wind, has no nearby neighbors and has a high-voltage power line and an electrical substation in the neighboring industrial park. Those facilities are capable of accepting the power the turbines would produce, the council was told.

“During construction, this project would hire 33 people,” Swartley said. “For full-time jobs, it would be seven people for maintenance. It is our policy to hire locally.”

Stephen Wollenburg of People’s Power and Light also spoke. That company, a nonprofit based in Boston, provides consulting expertise to municipalities considering ventures in renewable energy.
The company would be available to help the town through the financing process if the town considers developing the project on its own. The organization can also help town officials negotiate a better deal if it hires a private company like Apex to develop a wind farm.

Councilor Jay Lambert said the council would need several more meetings before it would sign off on any project.

“What is the economic benefit to the town?” he said. “I understand there will be taxes paid, but at some point I want to hear dollars and cents.

“We have to think through the impact the turbines will have on the development of the industrial park.”

Source:  By Kevin P. O'Connor, Herald News Staff Reporter | Posted Jul 30, 2013 | www.heraldnews.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky