[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Mary O’Donnell’s turbine team strikes back; Lawyer’s letter slaps at turbine opponents  

Credit:  By Kathryn Gallerani | Wicked Local Kingston | Posted Jul 19, 2013 | www.enterprisenews.com ~~

KINGSTON – Kingston wind turbine developer Mary O’Donnell’s representatives are angered by what they say are lies being spread about the turbines.

In a letter from O’Donnell attorney Jack Yunits – read aloud Tuesday night to selectmen during open forum by Michael Frenette, CFO of O’Donnell’s company, No Fossil Fuel Inc. – Yunits addresses the criticism.

Yunits wrote that residents who didn’t participate in the public process that led to lawful permitting of turbines in a designated turbine zone chose not to do so, not for lack of public outreach, and now are slandering these projects.

“In a twist of irony, some citizens who chose not to participate in the green-energy process are now leading a charge to derail Kingston’s progress by alleging without specifics as to time and place on the complaint forms provided by the town unsubstantiated, slanderous accusations against these companies.”

Yunits said a so-called wind report that was presented to selectmen by Country Club Way resident Tim Dwyer to selectmen at their last meeting, despite Dwyer being part of a lawsuit against O’Donnell, was “without any independent verification.”

He referred to a flicker study commissioned by the Massachusetts Clean Energy Center and presented to the Board of Health earlier this month as flawed due to the use of supposition to reach conclusions about flicker amounts.

“Flawed studies are not insubstantial, because they incite the public with inflammatory misinformation,” he said.

MassCEC spokesman Matt Kakley released a statement Wednesday in response to questions about Yunits’ claims and where CEC stands on a further flicker study.

“Part of MassCEC’s mission is to help communities address these types of issues,” he said. “After assisting the town in preparing a detailed flicker study that was based on industry standards, MassCEC is now assisting the town in exploring what would be needed if they were to prepare a curtailment plan.”

Frenette said No Fossil Fuel wants to work with the town and state Department of Environmental Protection to develop a factual wind data analysis model for the turbines.

Frenette had requested an appointment with selectmen Tuesday night but the request was not granted. Selectmen Chairman Elaine Fiore said they want to wait until Town Administrator Robert Fennessy is on board. Fennessy starts Aug. 1.

Source:  By Kathryn Gallerani | Wicked Local Kingston | Posted Jul 19, 2013 | www.enterprisenews.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.