[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

1,000 objections blow wind farm off course  

Credit:  The Southern Reporter | 14 July 2013 | www.thesouthernreporter.co.uk ~~

A wind farm development near the Cheviot Hills which attracted more than 1,000 objections has been thrown out by council officials.

The planning department’s decision on Tuesday ends a four-year battle led by campaign group Protect Your Cheviots to stop Whitton Wind Farm project near Morebattle going ahead.

Initially, applicants Vattenfall applied for six turbines in August 2009, which attracted around 800 objections. And despite submitting an amendment in February to reduce the proposal to five turbines by removing the machine closest to Oxnam, a further 400 dissatisfied comments were made to SBC.

Among them was the Duchess of Sutherland, who agreed that the development would mar views from the Eildons, Cheviots and Carter Bar. She added: “It would spoil a particularly magnificent part of our countryside and will be seen for miles around.”

SBC’s refusal report said the proposal would have “a significantly adverse effect on local landscape character” in an area which is currently wind farm free.

Vaffenhall cut the scheme’s size to meet concerns of the Ministry of Defence with regard to the impact on the Eskdalemuir’s underground nuclear testing station.

It was also offering the local community an incentive of up to £1.875million in spin-offs from the wind farm over 25 years, and the application did receive support, including Jedburgh councillor Sandy Scott, who said most of Morebattle’s residents were behind it.

A spokeswoman for Vattenfall said the company was disappointed with the council’s decision.

She told us: “We will now review the grounds for this decision and consider our options going forward.”

Source:  The Southern Reporter | 14 July 2013 | www.thesouthernreporter.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.