[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Revealed: How SNP pressurises councils to allow more wind farms 

Credit:  By Simon Johnson, Scottish Political Editor | The Telegraph | 13 June 2013 | www.telegraph.co.uk ~~

New evidence of the unprecedented pressure SNP ministers are exerting on Scottish planning authorities to allow more wind farm developments can be disclosed by the Daily Telegraph.

Correspondence obtained under Freedom of Information laws show Alex Salmond’s government has protested to council planners across Scotland that they have set aside too little land for turbines.

The Scottish Government ordered reluctant local authorities to highlight “areas of greatest opportunity” for more wind farms and urged them to adopt a “positive” attitude to further development.

Officials rejected any complaints that any individual area had “done its share”, arguing there is an “onus” on councils to identify more land even if they had already permitted a larger than average number of turbines.

Even land that included sensitive wildlife was not deemed untouchable if it was not specifically protected by Scottish Government planning policies.

Dumfries and Galloway Council was warned that ministers would appoint a senior official to review its planning blueprint if the local authority refused to get in line.

In contrast, the Coalition Government last week unveiled new planning rules for England allowing local communities to block new wind farms if there is significant opposition.

Mr Salmond has set a target of generating the equivalent of all Scotland’s electricity from renewable sources by the end of the decade, with the majority expected to come from onshore wind.

Although SNP ministers have recently moved to protect some wild land, Derek Mackay, the Scottish Planning Minister, told MSPs yesterday that their enthusiasm for onshore wind “remains as strong as ever”.

The documents show Simon Pallant, a senior Scottish Government planner, emailed Dumfries and Galloway Council on August 17 last year about a planning blueprint the local authority was developing for wind energy.

The plan wrongly excluded areas that were deemed to be of “local significance”, he said, before adding: “We are concerned that the approach used by the council is too stringent and restrictive and will deter development.”

He warned ministers would appoint a Scottish Government planning reporter to produce an “examination report” if the council ignored their views. “You will be aware that examination reports are largely binding on planning authorities,” he concluded.

Mr Pallant wrote again to the same council planner on October 29 complaining that some areas deemed to have “potential constraints” for wind farms were not consistent with Scottish Government planning policy.

These included land identified by the RSPB and Scottish National Heritage as “bird sensitivity areas” and wild land in Merrick.

Areas of “limited potential” for wind farm development should instead be presented on a map as “areas of greatest opportunity”, he suggested.

Mr Pallant also asked for the removal of a council league table of renewable schemes, adding: “It would not be appropriate to convey a message that Dumfries and Galloway has ‘done its share’”.

Stephen Hall, a Scottish Government principal planner, gave the same message to East Ayrshire Council in a letter of January this year, adding that there is an “onus” on all councils to look for “expanded areas of search” for land.

He rejected the local authority’s plans forcing wind farm developers to pay into a fund for community projects, stating: “We also question the assumption that wind farms cause a harm that requires recompensing”.

Mr Hall also wrote to South Ayrshire Council in February last year complaining that its draft local development plan “feels restrictive” towards turbines and urging it to act “positively” towards renewable developments.

Similar advice was issues to council planners in Moray, Angus, East Lothian and East Dunbartonshire, with the latter being told to adopt an approach “in line with the Government’s programme for renewable energy targets.”

Another Scottish Government planner wrote to Western Isles Council in November 2011 complaining that its guidance stated that wind farms should “not have a significant impact on the landscape character of the Outer Hebrides”.

Perth and Kinross and Stirling councils were also asked to remove wording from draft planning documents deemed to be too negative about wind farms.

This newspaper disclosed last year how Scottish Borders Council was pressurised to allow more turbines despite warnings the area was at “saturation point”.

Speaking on a visit to Holyrood yesterday, Owen Paterson, the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, urged the SNP to follow the Coalition’s example.

“In England we have made it very clear that local landscape, local topography, local environment and local heritage question can now be used as grounds for overriding national renewable energy targets,” he said.

The Scottish Government said it was a “legal requirement” for councils to consult planning officials in Edinburgh on emerging development plans but it was for local authorities to decide how they supported the construction of more turbines.

A spokesman said ministers are currently consulting on a “revised approach” on how local authorities should deal with planning applications for onshore wind.

Source:  By Simon Johnson, Scottish Political Editor | The Telegraph | 13 June 2013 | www.telegraph.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky