[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Governor to get bill to study changes to way Northern Pass, wind farms are sited 

Credit:  By GARRY RAYNO, State House Bureau | June 12, 2013 | www.unionleader.com ~~

CONCORD – A bill to revamp the criteria for siting large energy projects is headed to the governor’s desk.

Originally Senate Bill 99 would have established a one-year moratorium that would have halted the Northern Pass transmission project and numerous proposed wind farms.

Instead, the Senate’s voice vote Wednesday established two study committees to review the state Site Evaluation Committee’s ability and capacity to do its job and the criteria for siting wind farms and new electric generation and transmission facilities.

Several senators objected, saying this would result in a de facto moratorium on large energy projects.

Sen. Lou D’Allesandro, D-Manchester, called the bill’s time lines unrealistic. The study is to be completed by Dec. 31; it could take another year to adopt new regulatory criteria.

“This body overwhelmingly opposed a moratorium,” he said. “By concurring, you are enacting a de facto moratorium.”

But one of the bill’s sponsors, Sen. Jeff Woodburn, R-Dalton, urged the Senate to approve the House changes so the study could begin as soon as possible – along with changes to the site evaluation process.

“A longer study hall does not guarantee better grades,” Woodburn said, noting he is a former school teacher.

In the end, the Senate agreed to the House version of the bill.

Senate Majority Leader Jeb Bradley, R-Wolfeboro, said it is “absolutely essential” to have a study, particularly of projects like Northern Pass and the wind farms proposed around the Newfound Lake area.

“This can’t happen fast enough because we don’t have good siting criteria,” he said.

He argued the bill is not a de facto moratorium. Instead, he said, proposed changes will affect any developer proposing a future project.

The bill requires an outside consultant be hired to study the state’s Site Evaluation Committee’s process, needs and requirements, and to develop regulatory criteria.

Neither the $1.1 billion Northern Pass hydroelectric project or several proposed wind farms around Newfound Lake have gone before the Site Evaluation Committee yet.

Source:  By GARRY RAYNO, State House Bureau | June 12, 2013 | www.unionleader.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky