[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

County, townships fight turbine ruling  

Credit:  By Matt Sanctis, Staff Writer | Springfield News-Sun | June 6, 2013 | www.springfieldnewssun.com ~~

Champaign County and a handful of townships will ask the Ohio Power Siting Board to revisit its ruling on the Buckeye Wind Project, including issues such as road maintenance and other protections the county is seeking if the wind farm is built.

Last month the siting board approved the second phase of the Buckeye Wind Project, allowing as many as 52 turbines to be built across 13,500 acres of land in Goshen, Rush, Salem, Union, Urbana and Wayne townships. It would be combined with an earlier phase of the project that, in all, would mean as many as 100 turbines could be built in Champaign County.

On Wednesday, county commissioners and trustees from Goshen, Union and Urbana townships met in executive session and then voted to ask Kevin Talebi, Champaign County prosecutor, to seek a rehearing with the siting board on the decision.

In a brief in January, the county and townships raised concerns that included how the project might affect roads and bridges during the construction phase, the true economic benefit to the county and the financial impact the decommissioning phase of the project might have on the county, among other topics.

Some of those issues have been addressed, Talebi said, but the commissioners and township officials still have questions about aspects of the project.

“Some of those issues were addressed to the individual entities’ satisfaction, and where they weren’t, we’ve been asked by the townships and the commissioners to again raise those concerns and ask to reconsider the initial decision,” Talebi said.

Members of Union Neighbors United, a group of residents opposed to the project, have also said they plan to ask the siting board to reconsider its decision. If the parties involved are still not satisfied with the result, the case can then be appealed to the Ohio Supreme Court.

Proponents of the project, however, have argued the project will create jobs during construction and add revenue to schools and other local government entities. Jason Dagger, a spokesman for the project, has said the wind farm would provide as much as $20 million in annual payments to the county, schools and townships over the life of the project.

Talebi said the county would likely have to file its request for a rehearing late this month.

Source:  By Matt Sanctis, Staff Writer | Springfield News-Sun | June 6, 2013 | www.springfieldnewssun.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch