[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Ministry might have the final say on Drigg turbine  

Credit:  By Andrew Clarke | The Whitehaven News | 30 May 2013 | www.whitehavennews.co.uk ~~

Campaigners against a highly controversial wind turbine have been thrown a lifeline, The Whitehaven News can reveal.

The government is considering whether to “call in” plans for a wind turbine at Drigg Moorside Farm – and Copeland Council has been blocked from awarding planning permission until it does so.

If the government’s National Planning Casework Unit (NPCU) calls the matter in on behalf of Eric Pickles, the secretary of state for communities and local government, it will take the decision away from Copeland Council and make it itself.

The blocking notice was sent to Copeland on Thursday last week – the day after councillors decided by a single vote to give planning permission to the 45m-high turbine.

It is understood the NPCU will review the matter – and decide on the call-in in due course – due to the public interest and controversy the application has attracted.

There were strong objections from four parish councils, one village forum, two campaign groups and 122 individual residents, concerned about a range of issues, notably visual impact. Forty-four letters of support were sent to the council.

Mike Harrington, who objected to the plans on behalf of Ravenglass Village Forum and Muncaster Parish Council at last week’s meeting, said: “This block is really good news, and an awful lot of people will be glad to hear it.

“The councillors who voted to approve this turbine should be ashamed of themselves.”

The row over the turbine has been ongoing for over a year, since applicant Stephen Shepherd first sought permission for a 80m-high structure on his land.

Copeland Council turned down this proposal last May. Mr Shepherd appealed against the decision, but this appeal was rejected by the government’s Planning Inspectorate which backed Copeland’s original decision. This matter is now being considered by the High Court in a judicial review.

The second proposed turbine is almost half the height and 40 metres away from the previous site.

On the advice of their officers, councillors voted six to five in favour of awarding planning permission, ruling that the benefits of generating renewable energy outweigh any potential harm on the landscape. Crucially, no objection was lodged this time by the Lake District National Park Authority.

Source:  By Andrew Clarke | The Whitehaven News | 30 May 2013 | www.whitehavennews.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.