[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

‘Back-door’ deal with wind farm loses in court  

Credit:  By MEGHAN PIERCE, Union Leader Correspondent | May 24, 2013 | www.unionleader.com ~~

ANTRIM – A Hillsborough judge has voided an agreement between the town and a Portsmouth-based renewable energy company, saying the pact was reached during illegal meetings.

Residents Mary Allen, Gordon Allen, Charles Levesque, Janice Longgood and Martha Pinello contended the town violated right-to-know laws in negotiating the payment in lieu of taxes (PILOT) agreement with Antrim Wind LLC. The project would erect 10 wind turbines on the Tuttle Hill-Willard Mountain ridgeline.

Mary Allen said the group filed the suit after seeking town emails to piece together how the PILOT was negotiated. The group was willing to pay a $1 a page and then found out there were 1,300 pages, so it requested the pages in discovery.

“Going through them there was clear evidence that there had been email meetings, phone calls, meetings that had never been posted,” Mary Allen said. “It was all there, but you had to dig. ”

Selectman Gordon Webber said Thursday, “The Antrim Board of Selectmen (is) disappointed with the decision. We do not agree with the court’s decision; however, it is the court’s decision and we will not appeal it.”

A PILOT agreement would have made the proposed large-scale wind energy project financially feasible, while ensuring the town benefited, Webber said.

The project would have brought in $1 million a year without a PILOT agreement, Webber said.

But after a few years, the structure would have greatly depreciated to the point where very little money would have come in.

Allen and Levesque said their group is not for or against the wind energy project, but opposed to the closed-doors tactics used to create the PILOT, which would have hurt the town since Antrim is part of a nine-town cooperative school district that calculates a town’s tax obligation using a formula based on student population and the town’s assessed value.

Antrim would have ended up subsidizing the project, Allen said.

“My question is, why are we giving such a sweetheart deal to renewable energy,” Allen said.

Earlier this year, the state Site Evaluation Committee denied Antrim Wind’s application for a permit, saying that the impact to the conservation land surrounding the project would be too great.

The town and Antrim Wind are seeking a rehearing to overturn that decision.

Source:  By MEGHAN PIERCE, Union Leader Correspondent | May 24, 2013 | www.unionleader.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.