[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Let residents lead on wind  

Credit:  Monadnock Ledger-Transcript | Wednesday, May 15, 2013 | (Published in print: Thursday, May 16, 2013) | www.ledgertranscript.com ~~

Adam Cohen’s opinion piece in the March 9 paper failed to mention a number of things about wind. He did mention a couple of “successful” projects, but I question his definition of success – Groton is still a travesty for wildlife in the region. There are also many issues with wind projects in upstate New York – people getting sick from the flicker and noise, bats being decimated and more. Finally, he talked a lot about monetary benefits to local communities, but I notice he didn’t mention Lempster, and the problems they’ve had with related money issues. He also failed to mention that wind hasn’t benefited anyone in New Hampshire with lower electric rates, and I certainly haven’t seen any coal-fired plants closing.

The other thing Cohen didn’t mention is the fact that he doesn’t live here. The Town of New Ipswich changed their zoning because they were responding to the needs of the people who live there. It’s unfortunate that his company spent all that money, but risk is a cost of doing business.

Increasing use of renewable energy is mandated by law and in many cases, subsidized by the federal government, in the same way they subsidize oil and coal. I generally support renewable energy – of course, we want to reduce our use of fossil fuels that pour 90 million tons of carbon into the atmosphere every day. However, the feds have “everything on the table” and are not realizing that “one size” doesn’t necessarily “fit all.” Wind may be right in the plains and the desert, but in a state that prides itself on its natural beauty and relies on the tourist dollars that follow that natural beauty, we don’t appreciate subsidized companies “entrepreneuring” their way into New Hampshire. Our capitalist democracy works pretty well most of the time, but this time, science and local control should be leading the way.

Janet Renaud


Source:  Monadnock Ledger-Transcript | Wednesday, May 15, 2013 | (Published in print: Thursday, May 16, 2013) | www.ledgertranscript.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.