[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Try multi-category search (beta) »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind isn’t efficient energy source  

Credit:  May 2, 2013 | www.indystar.com ~~

An April 28 letter by Elizabeth Salerno, chief economist with the American Wind Energy Association, paints a rosy picture of one side of the economics of wind power but leaves out some of the negative aspects. Here’s the other side.

In an overwhelming tilt toward wind, the federal subsidy to wind power amounts to $55 for each 1 million watts of production capacity. In contrast, the subsidy for coal energy is 66 cents. All other fossil fuels, hydro power and nuclear are less than $2. Under current rules, wind project subsidies can be awarded for projects at any stage, even as early as ground-breaking.

Another downside of wind power is unreliability of output. It requires standby capacity for when it’s not windy and for peak loads, and standby power must be operational at all times and thus using energy, which is especially true of coal-fired power plants. They cannot be shut down and restarted instantly like an automobile.

Salerno’s claim that 70 percent of the content of each turbine is produced domestically may not reflect an analysis of the total work input to get to operation stage. A 2011 report by Information Handling Services, a specialist in energy industry information, reports that less than 8 percent of total worldwide wind turbine production was at that time produced in the United States. On the plus side, assembly and installation must be done domestically.

Finally, the claim that this is cheap energy is true only if you disregard the lavish subsidy of wind with consumers’ tax money. And subsidies favoring one energy source mean others will be at a disadvantage in technical development to improve their efficiency and environmental impact.

Daniel Warner

Greenwood

Source:  May 2, 2013 | www.indystar.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: