LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Town agrees to pay in civil case 

Credit:  Apr 30, 2013 - By Emily Matesic - wbay.com ~~

A civil lawsuit filed against the Town of Morrison has been settled. And the town will have to pay $50,000 to the people who filed the lawsuit.

It was almost a year ago when Jon and Lori Morehouse along with James and Barbara Vanden Boogart filed a lawsuit against the Town of Morrison.

The federal suit claimed the couples freedom of speech was being violated because the town had an ordinance on the books that prohibited signs, that expresses an opinion on an issue, from being displayed on private property.

In the Morehouse and Vanden Boogart’s case, the signs were about their opposition to wind turbines being built in the Town of Morrison.

“The town embarked on a long process of repeatedly serving them with takedown notices, attempting to fine them, and otherwise prohibiting them from exercising their First Amendment right,” says Rick Esenberg, who represented the Morehouses and Vanden Boogarts.

After talks and mediation sessions, the plaintiffs and the town reached a settlement that would pay the Morehouses and the Vanden Boogarts a total of $50,000.

Says Kevin Collins, Chairman of the Town of Morrison Board, “It comes to a point you’re dealing with taxpayers’ dollars and stuff, and so we wanted to, if we kept trying to fight things then that just prolongs the anger between parties and stuff and so I guess we just resolved to a solution that was the best for everyone.”

While about $20,000 of the settlement will go to pay legal fees, the plaintiffs’ attorney says his clients are pleased.

Esenberg says, “I think that they are happy that their constitutional rights have been vindicated, and not only will they be able to express themselves in the future but that other people.”

Source:  Apr 30, 2013 - By Emily Matesic - wbay.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky