[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Navitus Bay wind farm a ‘threat to status of Jurassic Coast’ 

Credit:  By Diana Henderson | Daily Echo | 17 April 2013 | www.bournemouthecho.co.uk ~~

The Society of Poole Men has nailed its colours to the mast and come out against proposals for the huge Navitas Bay wind farm off the Dorset coast.

Founded to protect the welfare of the town, the society monitors all planning applications and is consulted on planning policies, development and local plans.

Having kept an open mind throughout two previous rounds of public consultation and noted all the changes that had been made, members have now decided to oppose plans for a wind park 9.1 miles off Swanage, which could see as many as 218 turbines, 200m high.

Ian Andrews, president of the society, said in their response that it posed a considerable threat to the Jurassic Coast.

“The wind farm presents a threat not just to the status of the Jurassic Coast as Britain’s only natural World Heritage Site, but to marine and land-based visitors to it and the AONBs and national park in its vicinity.

“It is much nearer to this sensitive coast than any others under consideration or permitted.”

Its proximity to the shore was a visual and physical obstruction to all kinds of shipping and sailing, it posed a threat to the local natural beauty, the local economy and tourism, said the society.

The wind farm would also have an effect on migratory birds and marine mammals and nationally recognised seabird colonies, it added.

“Although short and middle- term jobs may be created in the port area, there is insufficient land available for this to be regarded as a factor weighing in its advantage.”

The society added: “The power source is the most inefficient of any alternative sources, yet unless there are changes by the government, will receive the greatest subsidy.

“This cannot be right or in the national interest.”

Source:  By Diana Henderson | Daily Echo | 17 April 2013 | www.bournemouthecho.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky