[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Council stand firm on wind farm plan fee 

Credit:  Gainsborough Standard | 17 April 2013 | www.gainsboroughstandard.co.uk ~~

The row surrounding controversial plans to build a wind farm on land at Hemswell Cliff near Gainsborough continues as the fee charged for the planning application comes under scrutiny again.

Earlier this year, local opposition groups questioned the amount that West Lindsey District Council charged RWE bosses for submitting their planning application for the 10 turbine wind farm on land 13km east of Gainsborough.

Opposition groups claim that RWE should have been charged the maximum application fee of £250,000 instead of £24,965.

However, amid rumours that WLDC had conceded that they charged the wrong fee for the Hemswell Wind Farm, they insist that this is not true and the correct coverage of land was considered. They say that Government advice on fees for wind farms states they should be calculated based on the area covered by the turbines themselves, the area swept by the blades,w here cable runs, the road ways and any other cabinets or buildings required for the development.

“It is clear that the fee should not be calculated based on the area of intervening land,” said a WLDC spokesman. “However the site edged red submitted with this application includes a wide area of land which is not affected by the development of the turbines themselves which, if taken as the site area and used to calculate the fee, would have resulted in the maximum amount of fee being payable – £250,000.”

He continued: “If this had been challenged at the time the application was registered, the applicant would have reduced the application area to correspond with the guidance set out in the fee regulations, they would not have paid £250,000.”

“Neither a request for a £250k fee nor a reduced site area would have resulted in the applicant abandoning their plans to develop a wind farm here. They would have simply produced a site edged in red which reflected their actual need with regard to this proposal. In this respect talk of a £250k fee is hypothetical in that it would never have been possible for us to collect this amount as the applicant would have reduce the area covered by the red edge to comply with Government guidance.”

Source:  Gainsborough Standard | 17 April 2013 | www.gainsboroughstandard.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky