[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Darlington area wind farm decision deferred  

Credit:  By Vicki Henderson, Darlington reporter | 31st March 2013 | Darlington & Stockton Times | www.darlingtonandstocktontimes.co.uk ~~

A decision on whether to remove a planning condition on a windfarm development that could protect residents from unacceptable levels of noise has been deferred to look at alternative legal safeguards.

Banks Renewables applied to Darlington Borough Council to remove a condition about the prevention and monitoring of amplitude modulation (AM), a noise side effect of some windfarms, at its six-turbine development at Moor House, on the outskirts of Darlington.

The council’s planning committee agreed to delay a decision to allow officers to work with the company to see if it is possible to agree an alternative legally-binding document that governs how potential AM complaints would be dealt with.

Residents from a number of villages in the area, which has not yet started construction, spoke against the bid to remove the condition, which they claim will leave them without legal protection should AM occur.

AM is a rare noise sound effect detected at some UK windfarms and can produce an intermittent, low-level thudding noise in certain conditions.

The company argued that the planning condition is redundant because there is no legal definition of AM and how to prevent it, and that its environmental management plan (EMP), which covers all aspects of how the windfarm will operate, offers the legal protection both residents and the council want.

Planning officer Roy Merritt said the council had received legal advice that the condition is not enforceable as it stands, but that as the EMP is currently written, it too would not be legally enforceable.

Mark Dowdal, a representative for Banks, said the company was willing to rewrite the EMP to satisfy concerns about AM.

He said: “We will work with council officers to agree a plan that will be reviewed each year.

“It will provide an agreed method of investigating and dealing with any noise complaints.

“The council will have a legally binding agreement in place for dealing with any concerns raised by residents.”

Peter Wood, who spoke on behalf of the Seven Parishes Action Group, called for the council to rewrite the AM condition to make it legally enforceable instead of removing it.

Committee chairman Paul Baldwin proposed that the condition be removed, subject to a revised EMP that must be agreed by the committee at a later date, and found to be legally binding.

Source:  By Vicki Henderson, Darlington reporter | 31st March 2013 | Darlington & Stockton Times | www.darlingtonandstocktontimes.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter